Literature DB >> 9476837

The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis.

T H Wagner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Researchers have tried to increase mammography screening rates by using patient-oriented reminders. This paper compares the effectiveness of mailed patient reminders at increasing mammography screening.
METHODS: Sixteen published articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. To assess the association between reminders and mammography screening, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated.
RESULTS: Among U.S. studies in which controls did not receive any type of reminder, women who received reminders were approximately 50% more likely to get a mammogram (OR 1.48; chi(2)MH(1) = 38.27, P < .001). In addition, tailored letters were found to be more effective than generic reminders (OR 1.87; chi(2)MH(1) = 4.70, P < .05). Combining cost and effectiveness data allowed for estimates of cost per woman screened, which ranged from $0.96 to $5.88.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient reminders are effective at increasing mammography screening. More research is needed to assess (1) the cost-effectiveness of patient reminders and (2) their effectiveness across race, education, income, and type of insurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9476837     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00003-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  36 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B J Edwards; A D Bunta; J Anderson; A Bobb; A Hahr; K J O'Leary; A Agulnek; L Andruszyn; K A Cameron; M May; N H Kazmers; N Dillon; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  A cluster-randomized trial of a primary care informatics-based system for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Richard W Grant; William T Lester; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Yuchiao Chang; Michael J Barry; Henry C Chueh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Selecting educational interventions for knowledge translation.

Authors:  Dave Davis; Nancy Davis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Comparison of interactive voice response, patient mailing, and mailed registry to encourage screening for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L Heyworth; K Kleinman; S Oddleifson; L Bernstein; J Frampton; M Lehrer; K Salvato; T W Weiss; S R Simon; M Connelly
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.

Authors:  Melissa A Romaire; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D S Tseng; E Cox; M B Plane; K M Hla
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Chronic low back pain: non-clinical factors impacting on management by Irish doctors.

Authors:  B M Fullen; C Doody; G David Baxter; L E Daly; D A Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  The use of computerized birthday greeting reminders in the management of diabetes.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Ann M Baker; George W Divine; Bruce D McCarthy; Hugo Xi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Improving fecal occult blood testing compliance using a mailed educational reminder.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Veronica Reis; Shanglei Liu; Lorraine Conn; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.