Literature DB >> 20872083

A cluster-randomized trial of a primary care informatics-based system for breast cancer screening.

Steven J Atlas1, Richard W Grant, William T Lester, Jeffrey M Ashburner, Yuchiao Chang, Michael J Barry, Henry C Chueh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information technology offers the promise, as yet unfulfilled, of delivering efficient, evidence-based health care.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a primary care network-based informatics intervention can improve breast cancer screening rates.
DESIGN: Cluster-randomized controlled trial of 12 primary care practices conducted from March 20, 2007 to March 19, 2008. PATIENTS: Women 42-69 years old with no record of a mammogram in the prior 2 years.
INTERVENTIONS: In intervention practices, a population-based informatics system was implemented that: connected overdue patients to appropriate care providers, presented providers with a Web-based list of their overdue patients in a non-visit-based setting, and enabled "one-click" mammography ordering or documented deferral reasons. Patients selected for mammography received automatically generated letters and follow-up phone calls. All practices had electronic health record reminders about breast cancer screening available during clinical encounters. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of overdue women undergoing mammography at 1-year follow-up. KEY
RESULTS: Baseline mammography rates in intervention and control practices did not differ (79.5% vs 79.3%, p = 0.73). Among 3,054 women in intervention practices and 3,676 women in control practices overdue for mammograms, intervention patients were somewhat younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and have health insurance. Most intervention providers used the system (65 of 70 providers, 92.9%). Action was taken for 2,652 (86.8%) intervention patients [2,274 (74.5%) contacted and 378 (12.4%) deferred]. After 1 year, mammography rates were significantly higher in the intervention arm (31.4% vs 23.3% in control arm, p < 0.001 after adjustment for baseline differences; 8.1% absolute difference, 95% CI 5.1-11.2%). All demographic subgroups benefited from the intervention. Intervention patients completed screening sooner than control patients (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A novel population-based informatics system functioning as part of a non-visit-based care model increased mammography screening rates in intervention practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00462891.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20872083      PMCID: PMC3019316          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1500-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  36 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  A security architecture for query tools used to access large biomedical databases.

Authors:  Shawn N Murphy; Henry C Chueh
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study.

Authors:  S H Taplin; W E Barlow; E Ludman; R MacLehos; D M Meyer; D Seger; D Herta; C Chin; S Curry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Office systems and their influence on mammography use in rural and urban primary care.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Edward F Ellerbeck; Denise Perpich; Niaman Nazir; Kevin McCarter; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Providers' reactions to an automated health maintenance reminder system incorporated into the patient's electronic medical record.

Authors:  Kenneth G Schellhase; Thomas D Koepsell; Thomas E Norris
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

6.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening.

Authors:  Laszlo Tabar; Ming-Fang Yen; Bedrich Vitak; Hsiu-Hsi Tony Chen; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Will L Tarver; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Racial differences in cancer screening with electronic health records and electronic preventive care reminders.

Authors:  Rebecca G Mishuris; Jeffrey A Linder
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions: are appropriate statistical methods being used?

Authors:  Catherine M Crespi; Annette E Maxwell; Sheng Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford; Dale McLerran; Ricardo Jimenez; Donald L Patrick; India Ornelas; Sonia Bishop; John R Scheel; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Role of practice-based research networks in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Daniel M Hartung; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Lyle J Fagnan; Melinda M Davis; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 6.  Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Omar Hasan; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Mining Electronic Health Records to Promote the Reach of Digital Interventions for Cancer Prevention Through Proactive Electronic Outreach: Protocol for the Mixed Methods OptiMine Study.

Authors:  Michael S Amato; Sherine El-Toukhy; Lorien C Abroms; Henry Goodfellow; Alex T Ramsey; Tracey Brown; Helena Jopling; Zarnie Khadjesari
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-12-31

8.  Population-based breast cancer screening in a primary care network.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Yuchiao Chang; William T Lester; Michael J Barry; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.229

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.