Literature DB >> 22627089

Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.

Melissa A Romaire1, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Melissa L Anderson, Diana S M Buist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reminder letters are effective at prompting women to schedule mammograms. Less well studied are reminders addressing multiple preventive service recommendations. We compared the effectiveness of a mammogram-specific reminder sent when a woman was due for a mammogram to a reminder letter addressing multiple preventive services and sent on a woman's birthday on mammography receipt.
METHODS: The study included 48,583 women 52-74 years enrolled in Group Health Cooperative, a health plan in Washington State. From 2005 to 2009, women were mailed 88,605 mammogram-specific or birthday letters. In this one group pretest-posttest study, we modeled the odds of obtaining a screening mammogram after receiving a letter by reminder type using logistic regression, controlling for demographic and healthcare use characteristics and stratifying by whether women were overdue or up-to-date with mammography at the mailing.
RESULTS: Among women up-to-date with screening, birthday letters were negatively associated with mammography receipt compared to mammogram-specific letters (birthday letters with 1-2 recommendations: OR=0.73; 95% CI:0.68-0.79; 3 recommendations: OR=0.74; 95% CI:0.69-0.78; 4-8 recommendations: OR=0.62 95% CI:0.55-0.68) after. Among overdue women, birthday letters with 4-8 recommendations were negatively associated with mammography receipt.
CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning from mammogram-specific reminder letters to multiple preventive service birthday letters was associated with decreased mammography receipt.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22627089      PMCID: PMC3694128          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  15 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening.

Authors:  X Bonfill; M Marzo; M Pladevall; J Martí; J I Emparanza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

2.  Screening rarely screened women: time-to-service and 24-month outcomes of tailored interventions.

Authors:  Barbara Valanis; Evelyn E Whitlock; John Mullooly; Thomas Vogt; Sabina Smith; ChuHe Chen; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Recommendations for client- and provider-directed interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert C Burack; Phyllis A Gimotty; Michael Simon; Anita Moncrease; Peter Dews
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women.

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Gillian Haber; Kofi A Semenya; Margaret K Hargreaves
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.

Authors:  László Tabár; Bedrich Vitak; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Anders Cohen; Tibor Tot; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Johan Rosell; Helena Fohlin; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Barbara K Rimer; Jeanine M Matuszewski; David Farrell; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient-centered outcomes in imaging: quantifying value.

Authors:  Ruth C Carlos; Diana S M Buist; Karen J Wernli; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Cancer Screening Reminders: Addressing the Spectrum of Patient Preferences.

Authors:  Susan D Brandzel; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Arika Wieneke; Susan Carol Bradford; Kilian Kimbel; Hongyuan Gao; Diana Sm Buist
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

3.  Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Tracy Onega; Susan Brandzel; Melissa A Rabelhofer; Susan Carol Bradford; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford; Dale McLerran; Ricardo Jimenez; Donald L Patrick; India Ornelas; Sonia Bishop; John R Scheel; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Hongyuan Gao; Susan Brandzel; Susan Carol Bradford; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.018

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.