Literature DB >> 19304477

Characterizing response to elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise: an FMRI study.

Gregory G Tamer1, Wen-Ming Luh, Thomas M Talavage.   

Abstract

Acoustic imaging noise produced during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can hinder auditory fMRI research analysis by altering the properties of the acquired time-series data. Acoustic imaging noise can be especially confounding when estimating the time course of the hemodynamic response (HDR) in auditory event-related fMRI (fMRI) experiments. This study is motivated by the desire to establish a baseline function that can serve not only as a comparison to other quantities of acoustic imaging noise for determining how detrimental is one's experimental noise, but also as a foundation for a model that compensates for the response to acoustic imaging noise. Therefore, the amplitude and spatial extent of the HDR to the elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise (i.e., a single ping) associated with echoplanar acquisition were characterized and modeled. Results from this fMRI study at 1.5 T indicate that the group-averaged HDR in left and right auditory cortex to acoustic imaging noise (duration of 46 ms) has an estimated peak magnitude of 0.29% (right) to 0.48% (left) signal change from baseline, peaks between 3 and 5 s after stimulus presentation, and returns to baseline and remains within the noise range approximately 8 s after stimulus presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304477      PMCID: PMC2845537          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2016573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  44 in total

1.  Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex.

Authors:  P Belin; R J Zatorre; R Hoge; A C Evans; B Pike
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the FMRI BOLD response.

Authors:  R M Birn; Z S Saad; P A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Repeatability and variability of noise generated during MRI.

Authors:  G H C Tseng; T M Talavage; R S Hinks
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

7.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise.

Authors:  J L Ulmer; B B Biswal; F Z Yetkin; L P Mark; V P Mathews; R W Prost; L D Estkowski; T L McAuliffe; V M Haughton; D L Daniels
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  The role of planum temporale in processing accent variation in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Matthijs L Noordzij; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ruwan D Ranaweera; Minseok Kwon; Shuowen Hu; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Auditory neuroimaging with fMRI and PET.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise.

Authors:  Shuowen Hu; Olumide Olulade; Javier Gonzalez Castillo; Joseph Santos; Sungeun Kim; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.