OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of whole-body impedance cardiography (ICGWB), with electrodes attached to wrists and ankles, in the measurement of cardiac output (CO) on the basis of simultaneous comparison with thermodilution (TD) and direct oxygen Fick (Fick) methods. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: A surgical intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty consecutive subjects undergoing a coronary artery bypass surgery were investigated preoperatively. MEASUREMENTS: ICGWB derived CO was measured simultaneously with the TD and Fick methods to establish the biases and limits of agreement (LA) between the methods. RESULTS: The results obtained by ICGWB and the invasive methods showed good agreement. The bias and LA between COTD and COICG were 0.00 l/min: 1.37 and 1.37 l/min, respectively, and were close to those obtained between COTD and COFICK, 0.32 l/min; 1.74 and -1.10 l/min. The bias and LA between the COFICK and COICG were -0.32 l/min; -2.24 and 1.60 l/min respectively. The repeatability value of consecutive single measurements for ICGWB (RVICG = 0.57 l/min) was much better than for the TD method (RVTD = 1.10 l/min). CONCLUSION: There was close agreement between the results of the three methods in the measurement of CO. In sedated preoperative patients the accuracy of ICGWB is within clinically acceptable limits and its repeatability is excellent. ICGWB provides a useful alternative to the TD and Fick methods in cases where the pressures supplied by the pulmonary artery catheter are not essential.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of whole-body impedance cardiography (ICGWB), with electrodes attached to wrists and ankles, in the measurement of cardiac output (CO) on the basis of simultaneous comparison with thermodilution (TD) and direct oxygen Fick (Fick) methods. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: A surgical intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty consecutive subjects undergoing a coronary artery bypass surgery were investigated preoperatively. MEASUREMENTS: ICGWB derived CO was measured simultaneously with the TD and Fick methods to establish the biases and limits of agreement (LA) between the methods. RESULTS: The results obtained by ICGWB and the invasive methods showed good agreement. The bias and LA between COTD and COICG were 0.00 l/min: 1.37 and 1.37 l/min, respectively, and were close to those obtained between COTD and COFICK, 0.32 l/min; 1.74 and -1.10 l/min. The bias and LA between the COFICK and COICG were -0.32 l/min; -2.24 and 1.60 l/min respectively. The repeatability value of consecutive single measurements for ICGWB (RVICG = 0.57 l/min) was much better than for the TD method (RVTD = 1.10 l/min). CONCLUSION: There was close agreement between the results of the three methods in the measurement of CO. In sedated preoperative patients the accuracy of ICGWB is within clinically acceptable limits and its repeatability is excellent. ICGWB provides a useful alternative to the TD and Fick methods in cases where the pressures supplied by the pulmonary artery catheter are not essential.
Authors: A E Russell; S A Smith; M J West; P E Aylward; R J McRitchie; R M Hassam; R B Minson; L M Wing; J P Chalmers Journal: Br Heart J Date: 1990-03
Authors: A Rubini; D Del Monte; V Catena; I Attar; M Cesaro; D Soranzo; G Rattazzi; G L Alati Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: K Espersen; E W Jensen; D Rosenborg; J K Thomsen; K Eliasen; N V Olsen; I L Kanstrup Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: Tuomo Nieminen; Hannu Uusitalo; Väinö Turjanmaa; Gunilla Bjärnhall; Hans Hedenström; Jukka Mäenpää; Auli Ropo; Pekka Heikkilä; Mika Kähönen Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-05-24 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Tobias Täger; Clara Wiebalck; Hanna Fröhlich; Anna Corletto; Hugo A Katus; Lutz Frankenstein Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Anna Tahvanainen; Miia Leskinen; Jenni Koskela; Erkki Ilveskoski; Juha Alanko; Mika Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Lauri Lehtimäki; Eeva Moilanen; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka Pörsti Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Humam Hamid; Venla Kurra; Manoj Kumar Choudhary; Heidi Bouquin; Onni Niemelä; Mika A P Kähönen; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti; Jenni K Koskela Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Miia H Leskinen; Elina J Hautaniemi; Anna M Tahvanainen; Jenni K Koskela; Marika Päällysaho; Antti J Tikkakoski; Mika Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Onni Niemelä; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pauliina Kangas; Anna Tahvanainen; Antti Tikkakoski; Jenni Koskela; Marko Uitto; Jari Viik; Mika Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka Pörsti Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jésus Gonzalez; Christian Delafosse; Muriel Fartoukh; André Capderou; Christian Straus; Marc Zelter; Jean-Philippe Derenne; Thomas Similowski Journal: Crit Care Date: 2002-12-20 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Anna M Tahvanainen; Antti J Tikkakoski; Jenni K Koskela; Klaus Nordhausen; Jani M Viitala; Miia H Leskinen; Mika A P Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Marko T Uitto; Jari Viik; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 2.298