Literature DB >> 28147608

Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.

Douglas H Keefe1, M Patrick Feeney2, Lisa L Hunter3, Denis F Fitzpatrick1.   

Abstract

Human ear-canal properties of transient acoustic stimuli are contrasted that utilize measured ear-canal pressures in conjunction with measured acoustic pressure reflectance and admittance. These data are referenced to the tip of a probe snugly inserted into the ear canal. Promising procedures to calibrate across frequency include stimuli with controlled levels of incident pressure magnitude, absorbed sound power, and forward pressure magnitude. An equivalent pressure at the eardrum is calculated from these measured data using a transmission-line model of ear-canal acoustics parameterized by acoustically estimated ear-canal area at the probe tip and length between the probe tip and eardrum. Chirp stimuli with constant incident pressure magnitude and constant absorbed sound power across frequency were generated to elicit transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), which were measured in normal-hearing adult ears from 0.7 to 8 kHz. TEOAE stimuli had similar peak-to-peak equivalent sound pressure levels across calibration conditions. Frequency-domain TEOAEs were compared using signal level, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), coherence synchrony modulus (CSM), group delay, and group spread. Time-domain TEOAEs were compared using SNR, CSM, instantaneous frequency and instantaneous bandwidth. Stimuli with constant incident pressure magnitude or constant absorbed sound power across frequency produce generally similar TEOAEs up to 8 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28147608      PMCID: PMC5392094          DOI: 10.1121/1.4974146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Intermittent noise rejection, calibration and ear-canal measurements.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Otoreflectance of the cochlea and middle ear.

Authors:  D H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A model describing nonlinearities in hearing by active processes with saturation at 40 dB.

Authors:  E Zwicker
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1976

7.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Motion of the surface of the human tympanic membrane measured with stroboscopic holography.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Antti A Aarnisalo; Ellery Harrington; Maria Del Socorro Hernandez-Montes; Cosme Furlong; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  An in-situ calibration method and the effects on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shixiong Chen; Haoshi Zhang; Lan Wang; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  3 in total

1.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.