Literature DB >> 9373567

Long-term quality control of DXA: a comparison of Shewhart rules and Cusum charts.

D Pearson1, S A Cawte.   

Abstract

Long-term clinical trials using bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are now commonplace. It is important to maintain a high standard of quality control. In this study two methods of monitoring quality control measurements of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) equipment have been compared using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis: Shewhart multi-rule charts and Cusum charts. Computer-generated faults within daily spine phantom measurements were used. The Charts were then applied to 3 years of quality control data from one machine and the results related to hardware faults, random events and changes in the underlying BMD measurement. In the ROC analysis the Shewhart multi-rule chart performed as well or better than the cusum chart, but the stringency of the rules must be tightened to obtain optimal performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373567     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  10 in total

1.  Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  An evaluation of cusum analysis and control charts applied to quantitative gamma-camera uniformity parameters for automated quality control.

Authors:  A C Knight; E D Williams
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

Review 3.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  A comparison of two methods of measuring gamma camera uniformity.

Authors:  D Pearson; T Kapasi
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT.

Authors:  W A Kalender; D Felsenberg; H K Genant; M Fischer; J Dequeker; J Reeve
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  J O Westgard; P L Barry; M R Hunt; T Groth
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact.

Authors:  C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; M J Estilo; K Engelke; J Rosin; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: development of quality control rules and their application in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt; J A Biddle
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Quality control of bone densitometry in a national health survey (NHANES III) using three mobile examination centers.

Authors:  H W Wahner; A Looker; W L Dunn; L C Walters; M F Hauser; C Novak
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.741

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.

Authors:  T N Hangartner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Quality Control of DXA System and Precision Test of Radio-technologists.

Authors:  Ho-Sung Kim; Seoung-Oh Yang
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.