Literature DB >> 1563440

An evaluation of cusum analysis and control charts applied to quantitative gamma-camera uniformity parameters for automated quality control.

A C Knight1, E D Williams.   

Abstract

Gamma-camera uniformity is often monitored for quality control of performance. Many parameters can be derived from computer analysis of the image of a uniform (flood) source to obtain quantitative measures of uniformity. However, it is not clear which best reflect changes in uniformity, or how action levels should be set. The latter are essential for an automated analysis. To compare the various parameters and assess two techniques used for their analysis, a series of technetium-99m flood images were obtained consecutively. After establishing a baseline from repeated images, uniformity was degraded by offsetting the pulse height analyser (PHA) window by a small amount. Nine non-uniformity parameters were calculated for each flood image, including the Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) and National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) integral and differential uniformities, the uniformity index and the percentage of pixels more than 5% from the mean. All parameters were calculated for both central field-of-view (CFOV) and useful field-of-view (UFOV). Eighty such trials were carried out on two gamma-cameras. The PHA offsets ranged from 1-10 keV. The two techniques used for analysis were the control chart and cusum analysis. Decision levels were set for each parameter, as multiples of SD for the control charts or by varying the dimensions of a truncated V-mask for cusum analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were then used for an objective comparison of the parameters and of the analysis techniques. The area under the ROC curve was used to rank the parameters in order of sensitivity to change in uniformity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1563440     DOI: 10.1007/bf00184128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  13 in total

1.  Letter: A numerical index of gamma-camera uniformity.

Authors:  N J Cox; B L Diffey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Reproducibility and action levels for gamma camera uniformity.

Authors:  K C Young; K Kouris; M Awdeh; H M Abdel-Dayem
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Practicality of National Electrical Manufacturers Association performance specification measurements for user-based acceptance testing and routine quality assurance.

Authors:  B F Hutton; R C Smart
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Use of NEMA protocols for routine quality assurance.

Authors:  T D Cradduck; E Busemann-Sokole
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Scintillation camera nonuniformity: effects on cold lesion detectability.

Authors:  R J Van Tuinen; J B Kruger; G K Bahr; V J Sodd
Journal:  Int J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  1978

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Quality control of scintillation cameras using a minicomputer.

Authors:  B H Hasegawa; D L Kirch; M T LeFree; R A Vogel; P P Steele; W R Hendee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  BRH test pattern for the evaluation of gamma-camera performance.

Authors:  P Paras; G J Hine; R Adams
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  The usefulness of indices measuring gamma camera non-uniformity.

Authors:  P Sharp; I Marshall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Orthogonal-hole test pattern for quality control of scintillation cameras.

Authors:  R Y Chu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-term quality control of DXA: a comparison of Shewhart rules and Cusum charts.

Authors:  D Pearson; S A Cawte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  DXA longitudinal quality control: a comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis.

Authors:  S W Garland; B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.

Authors:  Robert Lorentsson; Nasser Hosseini; Jan-Olof Johansson; Wiebke Rosenberg; Benny Stenborg; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.