Literature DB >> 24707462

Quality Control of DXA System and Precision Test of Radio-technologists.

Ho-Sung Kim1, Seoung-Oh Yang2.   

Abstract

The image quality management of bone mineral density (BMD) is the responsibility and duty of radio-technologists who carry out examinations. However, inaccurate conclusions due to the lack of understanding and ignorance regarding the methodology of image quality management can be a fatal error to patients. The accuracy and precision of BMD measurement must be maintained at the highest level so that actual biological changes can be detected with even slight changes in BMD. Accuracy and precision should be continuously preserved for image quality of machines. Those factors will contribute to ensure the reliability of BMD examination. The enforcement of proper quality control of radiologists performing BMD inspections which brings about the durability extensions of equipment and accurate results of calculations will help the assurance of reliable inspections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone density; Densitometry; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Precision; Quality control

Year:  2014        PMID: 24707462      PMCID: PMC3970299          DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Metab        ISSN: 2287-6375


  13 in total

1.  Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Long-term quality control of DXA: a comparison of Shewhart rules and Cusum charts.

Authors:  D Pearson; S A Cawte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  DXA longitudinal quality control: a comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis.

Authors:  S W Garland; B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process-control charts.

Authors:  Y Lu; A K Mathur; B A Blunt; C C Gluer; A S Will; T P Fuerst; M D Jergas; K N Andriano; S R Cummings; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: development of quality control rules and their application in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt; J A Biddle
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Good clinical practice and audits for dual X-ray absorptiometry and X-ray imaging laboratories and quality assurance centers involved in clinical drug trials, private practice, and research.

Authors:  B A Blunt; D Jones; R K Svensen; D B Hans; J D Feinblatt; H K Genant
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 8.  What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management?

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Gary M Kiebzak; Barbara A Blunt
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 9.  Executive summary International Society for Clinical Densitometry position development conference Denver, Colorado July 20-22, 2001.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Edward S Leib; Ronald C Hamdy; Neil C Binkley; Paul D Miller; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  Technical standardization for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and fracture prediction in patients with spinal cord injuries and disorders.

Authors:  L Abderhalden; F M Weaver; M Bethel; H Demirtas; S Burns; J Svircev; H Hoenig; K Lyles; S Miskevics; L D Carbone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

3.  Prescreening for osteoporosis with forearm bone densitometry in health examination population.

Authors:  Chun Yue; Na Ding; Lu-Lu Xu; Ya-Qian Fu; Yuan-Wei Guo; Yan-Yi Yang; Xian-Mei Zhao; Zhi-Feng Sheng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Repeatability of Dixon magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for quantitative muscle fat assessments in the thigh.

Authors:  Alexandra Grimm; Heiko Meyer; Marcel D Nickel; Mathias Nittka; Esther Raithel; Oliver Chaudry; Andreas Friedberger; Michael Uder; Wolfgang Kemmler; Klaus Engelke; Harald H Quick
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 12.910

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.