Literature DB >> 8079669

Quality control of bone densitometry in a national health survey (NHANES III) using three mobile examination centers.

H W Wahner1, A Looker, W L Dunn, L C Walters, M F Hauser, C Novak.   

Abstract

A quality control (QC) program for bone mineral measurements at the proximal femur by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was designed for the osteoporosis component of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Major elements of the QC program are (1) a QC center for review of all scans, (2) setup procedures for and continuous monitoring of daily QC procedures, (3) reference standards for cross-calibration, (4) longitudinal studies for assessment of instrument stability, (5) monitoring of technologist performance, and (6) training. This report describes the results of the QC program of the first half of this 6 year study, which began in 1988. Measurements were performed on 7376 subjects in three mobile examination centers, which traveled to a new location about every 3 months, a total of 44 locations. A small percentage (3.5%) of all scans were rejected, mostly because of patient motion during scanning, but 33% of the remaining scans required reanalysis at the QC center to refine the location of the regions of interest. Precision in spine and hip phantoms was below 1% at all ROIs. In 535 subjects with duplicate scans, age 20-91 of both sexes, examined in a blinded review, precision for BMD at the femur neck ROI was 3.2% (CV) and 5.1% for Ward's triangle BMD. The central review improved scan quality, increased the number of usable scans, and reduced significantly the range of the mean percentage difference in the duplicate scans. Minor alterations in machine function were observed and corrected. QC results on phantoms were similar to those obtained with stationary instruments in dedicated laboratories. Retrospective analysis of the regression slopes from QC records did not show a need for correction of the data base, indicating that the instruments were stable during the course of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8079669     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  38 in total

1.  The 2002 Canadian bone densitometry recommendations: take-home messages.

Authors:  Aliya A Khan; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; William D Leslie; Brian C Lentle; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Lawrence Nicholson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Superiority of age and weight as variables in predicting osteoporosis in postmenopausal white women.

Authors:  Manfred Wildner; Andrea Peters; Vibhavendra S Raghuvanshi; Jörg Hohnloser; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density testing: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; G Michael Allan; Michael R Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Jogging and bone mineral density in men: results from NHANES III.

Authors:  M E Mussolino; A C Looker; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Ileum resection is the most predictive factor for osteoporosis in patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  R A van Hogezand; D Bänffer; A H Zwinderman; E V McCloskey; G Griffioen; N A T Hamdy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994.

Authors:  May-Choo Wang; L Beth Dixon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.

Authors:  W D Leslie; A Moayyeri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Impact of increased overweight on the projected prevalence of osteoporosis in older women.

Authors:  A C Looker; K M Flegal; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Anne C Looker; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth S Delzell; Susan Randall; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Hemoglobin and hip fracture risk in older non-Hispanic white adults.

Authors:  A C Looker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.