Literature DB >> 28372092

Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid.

Morteza Khaleghi1, Sunil Puria2.   

Abstract

Microphone placement behind the pinna, which minimizes feedback but also reduces perception of the high-frequency pinna cues needed for sound localization, is one reason why hearing-aid users often complain of poor sound quality and difficulty understanding speech in noisy situations. In this paper, two strategies are investigated for minimizing the feedback pressure (thereby increasing the maximum stable gain, MSG) of a wide-bandwidth light-activated contact hearing aid (CHA) to facilitate microphone placement in the ear canal (EC): (1) changing the location of the drive force and its direction at the umbo, and (2) placing an acoustic damper within the EC to reduce the feedback pressure at the microphone location. The MSG and equivalent pressure output (EPO) are calculated in a 3D finite element model of a human middle ear based on micro computed tomography (micro-CT) images. The model calculations indicate that changing the umbo-force direction can decrease feedback pressure, but at the expense of decreased EPO. However the model shows improvements in MSG without sacrificing EPO when an acoustic damper is placed in the EC. This was verified through benchtop experimentation and in human cadaver temporal bones. The results pave the path towards a wide-bandwidth hearing aid that incorporates an EC-microphone design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28372092      PMCID: PMC5848864          DOI: 10.1121/1.4976083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Christian Füllgrabe; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; K Ter-Horst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  S N Merchant; M E Ravicz; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A non-linear viscoelastic model for the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Mathieu Charlebois; W Robert J Funnell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Finite-Element Modelling of the Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Nima Maftoon; Jacob Pitaro; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-07

6.  A micro-drive hearing aid: a novel non-invasive hearing prosthesis actuator.

Authors:  Peyton Elizabeth Paulick; Mark W Merlo; Hossein Mahboubi; Hamid R Djalilian; Mark Bachman
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.838

7.  Measurements of three-dimensional shape and sound-induced motion of the chinchilla tympanic membrane.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Ivo Dobrev; Morteza Khaleghi; Weina Lu; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Ellery Harrington; Cosme Furlong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Preliminary evaluation of a light-based contact hearing device for the hearing impaired.

Authors:  Jonathan P Fay; Rodney Perkins; Suzanne Carr Levy; Michael Nilsson; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Computer-assisted time-averaged holograms of the motion of the surface of the mammalian tympanic membrane with sound stimuli of 0.4-25 kHz.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Nesim Hulli; Maria Hernandez-Montes; Ellery Harrington; Cosme Furlong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids.

Authors:  Hashir Aazh; Brian C J Moore; Deepak Prasher
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 1.493

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fluid-Structure Finite-Element Modelling and Clinical Measurement of the Wideband Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Nima Maftoon; Jacob Pitaro; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-18

2.  Mouse middle-ear forward and reverse acoustics.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.