Literature DB >> 24216771

Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Niels Søgaard Jensen1, Tobias Neher, Søren Laugesen, René Burmand Johannesson, Louise Kragelund.   

Abstract

The potential benefits of preserving high-frequency spectral cues created by the pinna in hearing-aid fittings were investigated in a combined laboratory and field test. In a single-blind crossover design, two settings of an experimental hearing aid were compared. One setting was characterized by a pinna cue-preserving microphone position, whereas the other was characterized by a microphone position not preserving pinna cues. Participants were allowed 1 month of acclimatization to each setting before measurements of localization and spatial release from speech-on-speech masking were completed in the laboratory. Real-world experience with the two settings was assessed by means of questionnaires. Seventeen participants with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairments completed the study. An inconsistent pinna cue benefit pattern was observed across the outcome measures. In the localization test, the pinna cue-preserving setting provided a significant mean reduction of 22° in the root mean square (RMS) error in the front-back dimension, with 13 of the 17 participants showing a reduction of at least 15°. No significant mean difference in RMS error between settings was observed in the left-right dimension. No significant differences between settings were observed in the spatial-unmasking test conditions. The questionnaire data indicated a small, but nonsignificant, benefit of the pinna cue-preserving setting in certain real-life situations, which corresponded with a general preference for that setting. No significant real-life localization benefit was observed. The results suggest that preserving pinna cues can offer benefit in some conditions for individual hearing-aid users with mild to moderate hearing loss and is unlikely to harm performances for the rest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hearing aids; localization; pinna cues; spatial hearing; spatial release from masking

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24216771      PMCID: PMC4070616          DOI: 10.1177/1084713813510977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  34 in total

1.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise.

Authors:  Kirsten Wagener; Jane Lignel Josvassen; Regitze Ardenkjaer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing aid types on the ability to locate sounds.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble; B LePage
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  A comparison of CIC and BTE hearing aids for three-dimensional localization of speech.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Sridhar Kalluri; Sara McLachlan; Susie Valentine; Brent Edwards; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; K Ter-Horst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: without is better than with.

Authors:  Tim Van den Bogaert; Thomas J Klasen; Marc Moonen; Lieselot Van Deun; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformation characteristics of the external human ear.

Authors:  S Mehrgardt; V Mellert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

8.  Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies.

Authors:  B E Walden; R K Surr; M T Cord; B Edwards; L Olson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life.

Authors:  Mary T Cord; Rauna K Surr; Brian E Walden; Laurel Olson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; B Lepage
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.

Authors:  Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Improvement of Adult BTE Hearing Aid Wearers' Front/Back Localization Performance Using Digital Pinna-Cue Preserving Technologies: An Evidence-Based Review.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Woojae Han
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2014-12-22

3.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.

Authors:  Suzanne Carr Levy; Daniel J Freed; Michael Nilsson; Brian C J Moore; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality.

Authors:  Tobias Neher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Pinna-Imitating Microphone Directionality Improves Sound Localization and Discrimination in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Tim Fischer; Christoph Schmid; Martin Kompis; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco Caversaccio; Wilhelm Wimmer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.