Literature DB >> 23649712

An energetic limit on spatial release from masking.

Virginia Best1, Eric R Thompson, Christine R Mason, Gerald Kidd.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that energetic masking limits the benefits obtained from spatial separation in multiple-talker listening situations, particularly for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. A speech target was presented simultaneously with two or four speech maskers. The target was always presented diotically, and the maskers were either presented diotically or dichotically. In dichotic configurations, the maskers were symmetrically placed by introducing interaural time differences (ITDs) or infinitely large interaural level differences (ILDs; monaural presentation). Target-to-masker ratios for 50 % correct were estimated. Thresholds in all separated conditions were poorer in listeners with hearing loss than listeners with normal hearing. Moreover, for a given listener, thresholds were similar for conditions with the same number of talkers per ear (e.g., ILD with four talkers equivalent to ITD with two talkers) and hence the same energetic masking. The results are consistent with the idea that increased energetic masking, rather than a specific spatial deficit, may limit performance for hearing-impaired listeners in spatialized speech mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23649712      PMCID: PMC3705080          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0392-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  21 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; K Ter-Horst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatial release from masking as a function of the spectral overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Eric R Thompson; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Predicting binaural gain in intelligibility and release from masking for speech.

Authors:  H Levitt; L R Rabiner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired.

Authors:  D Byrne; A Parkinson; P Newall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  14 in total

1.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Dichotic listening performance and effort as a function of spectral resolution and interaural symmetry.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  EEG power spectral dynamics associated with listening in adverse conditions.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Destiny R Bell; Michelle Wheeler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.348

8.  Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Daniel Eisenberg; Kristina DeRoy Milvae
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.157

9.  The Benefits of Increased Sensation Level and Bandwidth for Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Kasey M Jakien; Sean D Kampel; Samuel Y Gordon; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Kameron K Clayton; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.