Literature DB >> 9337578

Features and their configuration in face recognition.

J W Tanaka1, J A Sengco.   

Abstract

Tanaka and Farah (1993) have proposed a holistic approach to face recognition in which information about the features of a face and their configuration are combined together in the face representation. An implication of the holistic hypothesis is that alterations in facial configuration should interfere with retrieval of features. In four experiments, the effect of configuration on feature recognition was investigated by creating two configurations of a face, one with eyes close together and one with eyes far apart. After subjects studied faces presented in one of the two configurations (eyes-close or eyes-far), they were tested for their recognition of features shown in isolation, in a new face configuration, and in the old face configuration. It was found that subjects recognized features best when presented in the old configuration, next best in the new configuration, and poorest in isolation. Moreover, subjects were not sensitive to configural information in inverted faces (Experiment 2) or nonface stimuli (i.e., houses; Experiments 3 and 4). Importantly, for normal faces, altering the spatial location of the eyes not only impaired subjects' recognition of the eye features but also impaired their recognition of the nose and mouth features-features whose spatial locations were not directly altered. These findings emphasize the interdependency of featural and configural information in a holistic face representation.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337578     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  Becoming a face expert.

Authors:  S Carey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Three-dimensionality and discriminability in the object-superiority effect.

Authors:  J T Enns; A B Gilani
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-09

4.  The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces.

Authors:  J A Hosie; H D Ellis; N D Haig
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-04

6.  Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.

Authors:  G Rhodes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Visual detection of line segments: an object-superiority effect.

Authors:  N Weisstein; C S Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Inversion and configuration of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J Searcy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  101 in total

1.  Spatial frequencies in short-term memory for faces: a test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses.

Authors:  M J Wenger; J T Townsend
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

2.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

Authors:  E D Burgund; C J Marsolek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

3.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Jonathan Guez; Michal Marom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

4.  Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces.

Authors:  Rama Amishav; Ruth Kimchi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

5.  Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; James W Tanaka; Sophie Lebrecht; Michael J Tarr; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-08

6.  The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition.

Authors:  Sarah J Casey; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; Nilli Lavie; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

8.  Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

9.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

10.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.