Literature DB >> 11082854

Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

E D Burgund1, C J Marsolek.   

Abstract

Participants viewed objects in the central visual field and then named either same or different depth-orientation views of these objects presented briefly in the left or the right visual field. The different-orientation views contained either the same or a different set of parts and relations. Viewpoint-dependent priming was observed when test views were presented directly to the right hemisphere (RH), but not when test views were presented directly to the left hemisphere (LH). Moreover, this pattern of results did not depend on whether the same or a different set of parts and relations could be recovered from the different-orientation views. Results support the theory that a specific subsystem operates more effectively than an abstract subsystem in the RH and stores objects in a manner that produces viewpoint-dependent effects, whereas an abstract subsystem operates more effectively than a specific subsystem in the LH and does not store objects in a viewpoint-dependent manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11082854     DOI: 10.3758/bf03214360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  36 in total

Review 1.  Representation is representation of similarities.

Authors:  S Edelman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  S Edelman; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Priming contour-deleted images: evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition.

Authors:  I Biederman; E E Cooper
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  T Poggio; S Edelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects.

Authors:  R Lawson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-08

6.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere.

Authors:  C J Marsolek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition.

Authors:  K Tanaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Routes to object constancy: implications from neurological impairments of object constancy.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; M J Riddoch
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1984-08

Review 10.  Visual object recognition.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  19 in total

1.  Laterality effects in the recognition of depth-rotated novel objects.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; G Hayward; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Repetition suppression in occipitotemporal cortex despite negligible visual similarity: evidence for postperceptual processing?

Authors:  Aidan J Horner; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Invariance to rotation in depth measured by masked repetition priming is dependent on prime duration.

Authors:  Marianna D Eddy; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Cortical regions associated with different aspects of object recognition performance.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Alison B Farley
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Cerebral asymmetries in sleep-dependent processes of memory consolidation.

Authors:  Philippe Peigneux; Remy Schmitz; Sylvie Willems
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Priming for letters and pseudoletters in mid-fusiform cortex: examining letter selectivity and case invariance.

Authors:  E Darcy Burgund; Yi Guo; Elyse L Aurbach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Can theories of visual representation help to explain asymmetries in amygdala function?

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Mid-fusiform activation during object discrimination reflects the process of differentiating structural descriptions.

Authors:  Xun Liu; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Alison B Farley; Charles D Smith; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception.

Authors:  Soojin Park; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  When side matters: hemispheric processing and the visual specificity of emotional memories.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Elizabeth S Choi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.