Literature DB >> 19170473

A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Kim M Curby1, Kuba Glazek, Isabel Gauthier.   

Abstract

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) is limited, especially for complex objects. Its capacity, however, is greater for faces than for other objects; this advantage may stem from the holistic nature of face processing. If the holistic processing explains this advantage, object expertise--which also relies on holistic processing--should endow experts with a VSTM advantage. The authors compared VSTM for cars among car experts and car novices. Car experts, but not car novices, demonstrated a VSTM advantage similar to that for faces; this advantage was orientation specific and was correlated with an individual's level of car expertise. Control experiments ruled out accounts based solely on verbal- or long-term memory representations. These findings suggest that the processing advantages afforded by visual expertise result in domain-specific increases in VSTM capacity, perhaps by allowing experts to maximize the use of an inherently limited VSTM system. Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19170473      PMCID: PMC4159943          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  61 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain.

Authors:  B Rossion; I Gauthier; M J Tarr; P Despland; R Bruyer; S Linotte; M Crommelinck
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-01-17       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Authors:  H Leder; V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

5.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions.

Authors:  Stefan R Schweinberger; Esther C Pickering; Ines Jentzsch; A Mike Burton; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-11

6.  Activity in fusiform face area modulated as a function of working memory load.

Authors:  T J Druzgal; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-01

7.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Nancy Kanwisher; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: the roles of feature proximity and connectedness.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-07

10.  Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?

Authors:  Stephan M Collishaw; Graham J Hole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  61 in total

1.  Enhancing visual working memory encoding: The role of target novelty.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Jejoong Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011

2.  Selecting and perceiving multiple visual objects.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

5.  Familiarity increases the number of remembered Pokémon in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

6.  Relationships between expertise and distinctiveness: Abnormal medical images lead to enhanced memory performance only in experts.

Authors:  Hayden M Schill; Jeremy M Wolfe; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-14

7.  Frontoparietal neurostimulation modulates working memory training benefits and oscillatory synchronization.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Kara J Blacker; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Ana E Van Gulick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Expertise Effects in Face-Selective Areas are Robust to Clutter and Diverted Attention, but not to Competition.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Ana E Van Gulick; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.