Literature DB >> 9284255

Effective dose and energy imparted in diagnostic radiology.

W Huda1, N A Gkanatsios.   

Abstract

The patient effective dose, E, is an indicator of the stochastic radiation risk associated with radiographic or fluoroscopic x-ray examinations. Determining effective doses for radiologic examinations by measurement or calculation is generally very difficult. By contrast, the energy imparted, epsilon, to the patient may be obtained from the x-ray exposure-area product incident on the patient. As energy imparted is approximately proportional to the effective dose for any given x-ray radiographic view, the availability of E/epsilon ratios for common radiographic projections provides a convenient way for estimating effective doses. Ratios of E/epsilon were obtained for 68 projections using E and epsilon values obtained from published dosimetry data computed using Monte Carlo techniques on an adult anthropomorphic phantom. The average E/epsilon ratio for the 68 projections in adults was 17.8+/-1.4 mSv/J, whereas uniform whole body irradiation corresponds to 14.1 mSv/J. The major determinant of E/epsilon ratios was the projection employed (the body region irradiated and x-ray beam orientation), whereas the tube potential and beam filtration were of secondary importance. Adult E/epsilon ratios may also be used to obtain effective doses to pediatric patients undergoing x-ray examinations by application of a correction factor based on the patient mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9284255     DOI: 10.1118/1.598153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children's hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; Bo Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08

2.  Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.

Authors:  Yakun Zhang; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  CT dose reduction in children.

Authors:  Peter Vock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Severe obesity is associated with 3-fold higher radiation dose rate during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; David A Zamora; Kalpana M Kanal; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Jeffrey J Nepple; John M Martel; Young-Jo Kim; Ira Zaltz; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; June E Parnell-Parmley; Salwa Haidar; Rahim Moineddin; Ellen Charkot; Guila BenDavid; Connie Krajewski
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-05-13

7.  Patient dose evaluation for the whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDMDCT) skeleton study in multiple myeloma (MM).

Authors:  Fabiola Cretti; Giovanna Perugini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Computing effective doses to pediatric patients undergoing body CT examinations.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-01-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.