BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional imaging (CT and MRI) is the gold standard for detecting femoral head-neck junction malformations in femoroacetabular impingement, yet plain radiographs are used for initial diagnostic evaluation. It is unclear, however, whether the plain radiographs accurately reflect the findings on three-dimensional imaging. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore: (1) investigated the correlation of alpha angle measurements on plain radiographs and radial reformats of CT scans; (2) determined which radiographic views are most sensitive and specific in detecting head-neck deformities present on CT scans; and (3) determined if specific radiographic views correlated with specific locations on the radial oblique CT scan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 surgical patients with preoperative CT scans (radial oblique reformats) and plain radiographs (AP pelvis, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and crosstable lateral). Alpha angles were measured on plain radiographs and CT reformats. RESULTS: The complete radiographic series was 86% to 90% sensitive in detecting abnormal alpha angles on CT. The maximum alpha angle on plain radiographs was greater than that of CT reformats in 61% of cases. Exclusion of the crosstable lateral did not affect the sensitivity (86%-88%). The Dunn view was most sensitive (71%-80%). The frog lateral showed the best specificity (91%-100%). Substantial correlations (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.64-0.75) between radiograph and radial oblique CT position were observed, including AP/12:00 (superior), Dunn/1:00 (anterolateral), frog/3:00 (anterior), and crosstable/3:00 (anterior). CONCLUSIONS: For diagnostic and treatment purposes, a three-view radiographic hip series (AP pelvis, 45° Dunn, and frog lateral) effectively characterizes femoral head-neck junction malformations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional imaging (CT and MRI) is the gold standard for detecting femoral head-neck junction malformations in femoroacetabular impingement, yet plain radiographs are used for initial diagnostic evaluation. It is unclear, however, whether the plain radiographs accurately reflect the findings on three-dimensional imaging. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore: (1) investigated the correlation of alpha angle measurements on plain radiographs and radial reformats of CT scans; (2) determined which radiographic views are most sensitive and specific in detecting head-neck deformities present on CT scans; and (3) determined if specific radiographic views correlated with specific locations on the radial oblique CT scan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 surgical patients with preoperative CT scans (radial oblique reformats) and plain radiographs (AP pelvis, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and crosstable lateral). Alpha angles were measured on plain radiographs and CT reformats. RESULTS: The complete radiographic series was 86% to 90% sensitive in detecting abnormal alpha angles on CT. The maximum alpha angle on plain radiographs was greater than that of CT reformats in 61% of cases. Exclusion of the crosstable lateral did not affect the sensitivity (86%-88%). The Dunn view was most sensitive (71%-80%). The frog lateral showed the best specificity (91%-100%). Substantial correlations (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.64-0.75) between radiograph and radial oblique CT position were observed, including AP/12:00 (superior), Dunn/1:00 (anterolateral), frog/3:00 (anterior), and crosstable/3:00 (anterior). CONCLUSIONS: For diagnostic and treatment purposes, a three-view radiographic hip series (AP pelvis, 45° Dunn, and frog lateral) effectively characterizes femoral head-neck junction malformations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Christian W A Pfirrmann; Bernard Mengiardi; Claudio Dora; Fabian Kalberer; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marc J Philippon; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; David A Kuppersmith; R Brian Maxwell; Allston J Stubbs Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-08-16 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Michael T Milone; Asheesh Bedi; Lazaros Poultsides; Erin Magennis; J W Thomas Byrd; Christopher M Larson; Bryan T Kelly Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Edwin R Cadet; Oladapo M Babatunde; Prakash Gorroochurn; Andrew K Chan; Agata Stancato-Pasik; Marc Brown; Skylar Johnson; Philip Burns Kaiser; Thomas R Gardner; Olufemi R Ayeni Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jeffrey J Nepple; Marc J Philippon; Kevin J Campbell; Grant J Dornan; Kyle S Jansson; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-02-09 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Marc J Philippon; Jeffrey J Nepple; Kevin J Campbell; Grant J Dornan; Kyle S Jansson; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Joel Wells; Jeffrey J Nepple; Karla Crook; James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Perry Schoenecker; John C Clohisy Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.176