Literature DB >> 9282889

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl.

G Taschenberger1, G A Manley.   

Abstract

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) were studied in a bird, the barn owl. They were found in 79% of the ears investigated, and each emitting ear generated on average 1.9 emissions. Their peak sound-pressure levels lay between -5.8 and 10.3 dB, and their centre frequencies between 2.3 and 10.5 kHz. The SOAE originated primarily in the upper quarter of the animal's hearing range, and derived from a specialized area previously described as being within an auditory fovea. Indeed, 93% of the emissions had centre frequencies above 7.5 kHz. The median of the frequency distances between neighbouring SOAE was 406 Hz (0.058 oct). The 3 dB bandwidth of the emissions depended on their amplitude above the noise: for SOAE whose level exceeded 10 dB above the noise floor, the 3 dB bandwidths ranged between 4.5 and 11.4 Hz. SOAE frequencies were temperature sensitive. Raising the temperature shifted the emissions to higher frequencies, and vice versa (the frequency shifted on average 0.039 oct/degrees C). External tones could suppress the level of SOAE, an effect that was highly tuned. For SOAE with frequencies between 2.5 and 10.5 kHz, the Q(10dB) values of 2 dB iso-suppression tuning curves (STC) varied from 1.07 to 10.40. The best thresholds of 2 dB STC were generally below 15 dB SPL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9282889     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00070-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  17 in total

1.  Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

Authors:  C Köppl; G Yates
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Frequency clustering in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from a lizard's ear.

Authors:  Andrej Vilfan; Thomas Duke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

Review 5.  Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?

Authors:  Manfred Kössl; Doreen Möckel; Melanie Weber; Ernst-August Seyfarth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Florian Fruth; Frank Jülicher; Benjamin Lindner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-18

10.  Salient features of otoacoustic emissions are common across tetrapod groups and suggest shared properties of generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Geoffrey A Manley; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.