Literature DB >> 24437770

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.

Rachael R Baiduc1, Jungmee Lee2, Sumitrajit Dhar3.   

Abstract

Hearing thresholds have been shown to exhibit periodic minima and maxima, a pattern known as threshold microstructure. Microstructure has previously been linked to spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and normal cochlear function. However, SOAEs at high frequencies (>4 kHz) have been associated with hearing loss or cochlear pathology in some reports. Microstructure would not be expected near these high-frequency SOAEs. Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs), the expression of frequency selectivity, may also be altered by SOAEs. Prior comparisons of tuning between ears with and without SOAEs demonstrated sharper tuning in ears with emissions. Here, threshold microstructure and PTCs were compared at SOAE frequencies ranging between 1.2 and 13.9 kHz using subjects without SOAEs as controls. Results indicate: (1) Threshold microstructure is observable in the vicinity of SOAEs of all frequencies; (2) PTCs are influenced by SOAEs, resulting in shifted tuning curve tips, multiple tips, or inversion. High frequency SOAEs show a greater effect on PTC morphology. The influence of most SOAEs at high frequencies on threshold microstructure and PTCs is consistent with those at lower frequencies, suggesting that high-frequency SOAEs reflect the same cochlear processes that lead to SOAEs at lower frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24437770      PMCID: PMC3985964          DOI: 10.1121/1.4840775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  56 in total

Review 1.  Novel schemes for hearing and orientation in insects.

Authors:  Daniel Robert; Martin C Göpfert
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Edward M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Cochlear amplification, outer hair cells and prestin.

Authors:  Peter Dallos
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: measurement and data.

Authors:  M J Penner; L Glotzbach; T Huang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a dog.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; B Kramek; N C Rich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds.

Authors:  G R Long
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants.

Authors:  E A Strickland; E M Burns; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.

Authors:  W W Clark; D O Kim; P M Zurek; B A Bohne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  5 in total

1.  A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual Differences in Behavioural Decision Weights Related to Irregularities in Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Kristen Bond; Christophe Stoelinga; Robert Lutfi; Glenis Long
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela E Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Characteristic of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions: Detection Rate, Musical Training Influence, and Gain Function.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Zhihang Qi; Mengmeng Yu; Jinhai Wang; Ruijuan Chen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-09-26

5.  Effect of Musical Experience on Cochlear Frequency Resolution: An Estimation of PTCs, DLF and SOAEs.

Authors:  Konika Kakar; J Prajna Bhat; Suresh Thontadarya
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.017

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.