Literature DB >> 25140416

An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Florian Fruth1, Frank Jülicher2, Benjamin Lindner3.   

Abstract

Even in the absence of external stimulation, the cochleas of most humans emit very faint sounds below the threshold of hearing, sounds that are known as spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. They are a signature of the active amplification mechanism in the cochlea. Emissions occur at frequencies that are unique for an individual and change little over time. The statistics of a population of ears exhibit characteristic features such as a preferred relative frequency distance between emissions (interemission intervals). We propose a simplified cochlea model comprising an array of active nonlinear oscillators coupled both hydrodynamically and viscoelastically. The oscillators are subject to a weak spatial disorder that lends individuality to the simulated cochlea. Our model captures basic statistical features of the emissions: distributions of 1), emission frequencies; 2), number of emissions per ear; and 3), interemission intervals. In addition, the model reproduces systematic changes of the interemission intervals with frequency. We show that the mechanism for the preferred interemission interval in our model is the occurrence of synchronized clusters of oscillators.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25140416      PMCID: PMC4142242          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  43 in total

1.  Essential nonlinearities in hearing.

Authors:  V M Eguíluz; M Ospeck; Y Choe; A J Hudspeth; M O Magnasco
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-05-29       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Active traveling wave in the cochlea.

Authors:  Thomas Duke; Frank Jülicher
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Spontaneous basilar membrane oscillation and otoacoustic emission at 15 kHz in a guinea pig.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; K Grosh; J Zheng; E de Boer; Y Zou; T Ren
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Edward M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Statistics of instabilities in a state space model of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Emery M Ku; Stephen J Elliott; Ben Lineton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Are human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions generated by a chain of coupled nonlinear oscillators?

Authors:  Hero P Wit; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl.

Authors:  G Taschenberger; G A Manley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; W J Murphy; A Tubis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin; R Probst; A C Coats
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  High-multiple spontaneous otoacoustic emissions confirm theory of local tuned oscillators.

Authors:  Martin Braun
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-27
View more
  5 in total

1.  All that jazz coming out of my ears.

Authors:  Pascal Martin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Salient features of otoacoustic emissions are common across tetrapod groups and suggest shared properties of generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Geoffrey A Manley; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The vibrating reed frequency meter: digital investigation of an early cochlear model.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; Hero P Wit
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Reducing tectorial membrane viscoelasticity enhances spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and compromises the detection of low level sound.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Charlsie Lemons; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Chaotic Dynamics Enhance the Sensitivity of Inner Ear Hair Cells.

Authors:  Justin Faber; Dolores Bozovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.