Literature DB >> 18516607

Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?

Manfred Kössl1, Doreen Möckel, Melanie Weber, Ernst-August Seyfarth.   

Abstract

Sensitive hearing organs often employ nonlinear mechanical sound processing which generates distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). Such emissions are also recordable from tympanal organs of insects. In vertebrates (including humans), otoacoustic emissions are considered by-products of active sound amplification through specialized sensory receptor cells in the inner ear. Force generated by these cells primarily augments the displacement amplitude of the basilar membrane and thus increases auditory sensitivity. As in vertebrates, the emissions from insect ears are based on nonlinear mechanical properties of the sense organ. Apparently, to achieve maximum sensitivity, convergent evolutionary principles have been realized in the micromechanics of these hearing organs-although vertebrates and insects possess quite different types of receptor cells in their ears. Just as in vertebrates, otoacoustic emissions from insects ears are vulnerable and depend on an intact metabolism, but so far in tympanal organs, it is not clear if auditory nonlinearity is achieved by active motility of the sensory neurons or if passive cellular characteristics cause the nonlinear behavior. In the antennal ears of flies and mosquitoes, however, active vibrations of the flagellum have been demonstrated. Our review concentrates on experiments studying the tympanal organs of grasshoppers and moths; we show that their otoacoustic emissions are produced in a frequency-specific way and can be modified by electrical stimulation of the sensory cells. Even the simple ears of notodontid moths produce distinct emissions, although they have just one auditory neuron. At present it is still uncertain, both in vertebrates and in insects, if the nonlinear amplification so essential for sensitive sound processing is primarily due to motility of the somata of specialized sensory cells or to active movement of their (stereo-)cilia. We anticipate that further experiments with the relatively simple ears of insects will help answer these questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18516607     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0344-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  52 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  In vivo evidence for a cochlear amplifier in the hair-cell bundle of lizards.

Authors:  G A Manley; D L Kirk; C Köppl; G K Yates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evolution and function of auditory systems in insects.

Authors:  A Stumpner; D von Helversen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2001-04

Review 4.  Mechanotransduction and auditory transduction in Drosophila.

Authors:  Maurice J Kernan
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  J Zheng; W Shen; D Z He; K B Long; L D Madison; P Dallos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Specification of auditory sensitivity by Drosophila TRP channels.

Authors:  Martin C Göpfert; Jörg T Albert; B Nadrowski; A Kamikouchi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Stimulus transmission in the auditory receptor organs of the foreleg of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae) I. The role of the tympana.

Authors:  M Bangert; K Kalmring; T Sickmann; R Stephen; M Jatho; R Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.

Authors:  M Kössl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Tympanal travelling waves in migratory locusts.

Authors:  James F C Windmill; Martin C Göpfert; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  10 in total

1.  Humming in tune: sex and species recognition by mosquitoes on the wing.

Authors:  Gabriella Gibson; Ben Warren; Ian J Russell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-26

2.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Frank Macías-Escrivá; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Mechanical basis of otoacoustic emissions in tympanal hearing organs.

Authors:  Doreen Möckel; Manuela Nowotny; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Otoacoustic emissions in bushcricket ears: general characteristics and the influence of the neuroactive insecticide pymetrozine.

Authors:  Doreen Möckel; Ernst-August Seyfarth; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Influence of ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia on cubic and quadratic high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D Schlenther; C Voss; M Kössl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-29

9.  Tonotopically arranged traveling waves in the miniature hearing organ of bushcrickets.

Authors:  Arun Palghat Udayashankar; Manfred Kössl; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A tympanal insect ear exploits a critical oscillator for active amplification and tuning.

Authors:  Natasha Mhatre; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 10.834

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.