UNLABELLED: To evaluate the performance of three digital devices regarding the noise added to digital radiographic images containing different optical densities. METHODS: A radiographic image was digitized repeatedly ten times using two scanners (HP 4c/T and HP 5370C) and a digital camera (Nikon 990). A histogram tool measured a mean pixel value and the standard deviation of the region of interest in each image. Both values were used to calculate the image noise at the different optical densities. RESULTS: The noise values found were different for all devices and optical densities. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the scanner HP 4c/T and the digital camera regarding the noise values. There was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between the noise values found for the HP 4c/T scanner and the digital camera and between both scanners (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The noise added to the image was higher for scanner HP 4c/T and less for the digital camera. The noise was higher at the lower optical densities for the scanners. It seems that depending on the equipment and the optical density, a variable amount of noise can be incorporated to the images.
UNLABELLED: To evaluate the performance of three digital devices regarding the noise added to digital radiographic images containing different optical densities. METHODS: A radiographic image was digitized repeatedly ten times using two scanners (HP 4c/T and HP 5370C) and a digital camera (Nikon 990). A histogram tool measured a mean pixel value and the standard deviation of the region of interest in each image. Both values were used to calculate the image noise at the different optical densities. RESULTS: The noise values found were different for all devices and optical densities. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the scanner HP 4c/T and the digital camera regarding the noise values. There was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between the noise values found for the HP 4c/T scanner and the digital camera and between both scanners (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The noise added to the image was higher for scanner HP 4c/T and less for the digital camera. The noise was higher at the lower optical densities for the scanners. It seems that depending on the equipment and the optical density, a variable amount of noise can be incorporated to the images.
Authors: M E Christian; H C Davidson; R H Wiggins; G Berges; G Cannon; G Jackson; B Chapman; H R Harnsberger Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Kenneth W Clark; William B Dawson; Edward Muka; Thomas K Pilgram; G James Blaine Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2002-03-19 Impact factor: 4.056