Literature DB >> 9263047

Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle.

J A Archer1, P F Arthur, R M Herd, P F Parnell, W S Pitchford.   

Abstract

The optimum duration of test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, feed conversion, and residual feed intake was examined using postweaning feed intake and weight data from 760 Angus, Hereford, Polled Hereford, and Shorthorn heifer and Angus bull progeny from 78 sires. Variance components, heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlations, and the efficiency of selection using shortened tests compared with a 199-d test were used as criteria to assess the optimum test length. The results indicated that a 35-d test was sufficient for measurement of feed intake, whereas a 70-d test was required to measure growth rate, feed conversion, and residual feed intake without compromising the accuracy of measurement. When a 70-d test is used to measure growth rate, feed conversion, and residual feed intake there is minimal loss in accuracy when weights are collected every 2 wk instead of weekly, but a further increase in the interval between weights to 5 wk caused a decline in the accuracy of the test. Therefore a 70-d test with cattle weighed every 2 wk seems to be optimal for measuring these traits in British breed cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9263047     DOI: 10.2527/1997.7582024x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  27 in total

Review 1.  Residual feed intake: a nutritional tool for genetic improvement.

Authors:  Leilson Rocha Bezerra; José Lindenberg Rocha Sarmento; Severino Gonzaga Neto; Ney Rômulo Oliveira de Paula; Ronaldo Lopes Oliveira; Wagner Martins Fontes do Rêgo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Test duration for water intake, ADG, and DMI in beef cattle.

Authors:  Cashley M Ahlberg; Kristi Allwardt; Ashley Broocks; Kelsey Bruno; Levi McPhillips; Alexandra Taylor; Clint R Krehbiel; Michelle Calvo-Lorenzo; Chris J Richards; Sara E Place; Udaya DeSilva; Deborah L VanOverbeke; Raluca G Mateescu; Larry A Kuehn; Robert L Weaber; Jennifer M Bormann; Megan M Rolf
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Infrared thermography as a tool to evaluate body surface temperature and its relationship with feed efficiency in Bos indicus cattle in tropical conditions.

Authors:  Luciane Silva Martello; Saulo da Luz E Silva; Rodrigo da Costa Gomes; Rosana Ruegger Pereira da Silva Corte; Paulo Roberto Leme
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.

Authors:  Ira L Parsons; Jocelyn R Johnson; William C Kayser; Luis O Tedeschi; Gordon E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Residual feed intake as a feed efficiency selection tool and its relationship with feed intake, performance and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo calves.

Authors:  Bisitha Kattiparambil Subhashchandra Bose; Shivlal Singh Kundu; Nguyen Thi Be Tho; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Umesh Balaji Sontakke
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Relationships among carbon dioxide, feed intake, and feed efficiency traits in ad libitum fed beef cattle.

Authors:  Paul F Arthur; Tracie Bird-Gardiner; Idris M Barchia; Kath A Donoghue; Robert M Herd
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Variability in residual feed intake and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo heifers.

Authors:  Tegene Negesse; Chander Datt; S S Kundu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Relationships between feed efficiency and puberty in Bos taurus and Bos indicus-influenced replacement beef heifers.

Authors:  Luara B Canal; Pedro L P Fontes; Carla D Sanford; Vitor R G Mercadante; Nicolas DiLorenzo; G Cliff Lamb; Nicola Oosthuizen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Reducing the period of data collection for intake and gain to improve response to selection for feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  Richard Mark Thallman; Larry A Kuehn; Warren M Snelling; Kelli J Retallick; Jennifer M Bormann; Harvey C Freetly; Kristen E Hales; Gary L Bennett; Robert L Weaber; Daniel W Moser; Michael D MacNeil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle.

Authors:  Megan M Rolf; Jeremy F Taylor; Robert D Schnabel; Stephanie D McKay; Matthew C McClure; Sally L Northcutt; Monty S Kerley; Robert L Weaber
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.