Literature DB >> 32589744

Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.

Ira L Parsons1, Jocelyn R Johnson1, William C Kayser1, Luis O Tedeschi1, Gordon E Carstens1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the differences in feeding behavior patterns of steers with divergent phenotypes for residual feed intake (RFI). Three trials were conducted with 508 Angus-based composite crossbred steers (body weight [BW] = 309 ± 57 kg) fed a high-concentrate diet in pens equipped with electronic feed bunks (GrowSafe System). Initial and final carcass ultrasound measurements (intra-muscular fat, backfat depth, and rib-eye area) were collected on days 0 and 70, and BW measured at 14-d intervals. Individual dry matter intake (DMI) and feeding behavior traits were collected for 70 d, and RFI calculated as the residual from the regression of DMI on average daily gain (ADG) and mid-test BW0.75. Steers were ranked by RFI and assigned to low-, medium-, and high-RFI classes based on ± 0.5 SD from the mean RFI within the trial. The feeding behavior traits evaluated in this study included frequency and duration of bunk visit (BV) and meal events, head-down (HD) duration, mean meal length, time-to-bunk interval, the maximum nonfeeding interval, and the day-to-day variation of these traits, defined as the root mean squared error (RMSE) from linear regression of each trait on the day of trial. Additionally, three ratio traits were evaluated: BV events per meal, HD duration per BV event, and HD duration per meal event. Low-RFI (feed-efficient) steers consumed 16% less (P < 0.01) DMI, while BW and ADG were not different compared with high-RFI steers. Low-RFI steers had 18% fewer and 21% shorter (P < 0.01) BV events, and 11% fewer and 13% shorter (P < 0.01) meal events per day compared with high-RFI steers. Furthermore, low-RFI steers exhibited less (P < 0.05) day-to-day variance in DMI, as well as in frequency and duration of BV and meal events and HD duration compared with high-RFI steers. Differences in feeding behavior traits due to RFI were minimally affected by covariate adjustment for DMI, indicating that steers with divergent RFI have distinct feeding behavior patterns that are largely independent of differences in DMI. These results suggest that feeding behavior traits may be useful biomarkers for the prediction of feed efficiency in beef cattle.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GrowSafe; beef cattle; day-to-day variation; feed efficiency; feed intake; feeding behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32589744      PMCID: PMC7357578          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  39 in total

1.  To split behaviour into bouts, log-transform the intervals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Interaction between bunk management and monensin concentration on finishing performance, feeding behavior, and ruminal metabolism during an acidosis challenge with feedlot cattle.

Authors:  G E Erickson; C T Milton; K C Fanning; R J Cooper; R S Swingle; J C Parrott; G Vogel; T J Klopfenstein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Technical note: Evaluation of bimodal distribution models to determine meal criterion in heifers fed a high-grain diet.

Authors:  J C Bailey; L O Tedeschi; E D M Mendes; J E Sawyer; G E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; E K Okine; G W Mathison; K Schmid; C Li; J A Basarab; M A Price; Z Wang; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Competition for feed affects the feeding behavior of growing dairy heifers.

Authors:  T J DeVries; M A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Relationships of feeding behaviors with average daily gain, dry matter intake, and residual feed intake in Red Angus-sired cattle.

Authors:  M McGee; C M Welch; J A Ramirez; G E Carstens; W J Price; J B Hall; R A Hill
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle.

Authors:  G Cantalapiedra-Hijar; M Abo-Ismail; G E Carstens; L L Guan; R Hegarty; D A Kenny; M McGee; G Plastow; A Relling; I Ortigues-Marty
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of monensin and monensin and tylosin combination on feed intake variation of feedlot steers.

Authors:  R A Stock; S B Laudert; W W Stroup; E M Larson; J C Parrott; R A Britton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Feeding behavior changes of cattle during introduction of monensin with roughage or concentrate diets.

Authors:  C A Baile; C L McLaughlin; E L Potter; W Chalupa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Energy cost of activities and locomotion of grazing cows: a repeated study in larger plots.

Authors:  A Brosh; Z Henkin; E D Ungar; A Dolev; A Shabtay; A Orlov; Y Yehuda; Y Aharoni
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  Supplementing a blend of magnesium oxide to feedlot cattle: effects on ruminal, physiological, and productive responses.

Authors:  Eduardo A Colombo; Reinaldo F Cooke; Ana Clara R Araújo; Kelsey M Harvey; Ky G Pohler; Alice P Brandão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.