Literature DB >> 30060045

Relationships among carbon dioxide, feed intake, and feed efficiency traits in ad libitum fed beef cattle.

Paul F Arthur1, Tracie Bird-Gardiner2, Idris M Barchia1, Kath A Donoghue2, Robert M Herd3.   

Abstract

Angus cattle from 2 beef cattle projects on which carbon dioxide production rate (CPR) was measured were used in this study to examine the relationships among BW, DMI, and carbon dioxide traits of beef cattle fed ad libitum on a roughage diet or a grain-based feedlot diet, and to evaluate potential proxies for DMI and feed efficiency. In both projects, the GreenFeed Emission Monitoring system, which provides multiple short-term breath measures of carbon dioxide production, was used as a tool to measure CPR. The data were from 119 Angus heifers over 15 d on a roughage diet and 326 Angus steers over 70 d on a feedlot diet. Mean (±SD) age, BW, and DMI were 372 ± 28 d, 355 ± 37 kg, and 8.1 ± 1.3 kg/d for the heifers, and 554 ± 86 d, 577 ± 69 kg, and 13.3 ± 2.0 kg/d for the steers, respectively. The corresponding mean CPR was 5760 ± 644 g/d for heifers and 8939 ± 1212 g/d for steers. Other traits studied included carbon dioxide yield (CY; CPR/DMI) and intensity (CI; CPR/BW) and 5 forms of residual carbon dioxide production (RCP), which is a measure of actual minus predicted CPR. Feed efficiency traits studied included feed conversion ratio (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI). The relationship between CPR and DMI, and between CPR and BW was both positive and linear, for the heifers and also for the steers. For the combined heifer and steer datasets, the R2 for the relationship between CPR and BW, and between CPR and DMI was 0.82 and 0.78, respectively. The correlation between CPR and DMI (r = 0.84 for heifers; r = 0.83 for steers) was similar to that between CPR and BW (r = 0.84 for heifers; r = 0.87 for steers). Most of the carbon dioxide traits were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with one or both feed efficiency traits. One of the RCP traits (RCPMA) was computed by maintaining metabolic BW (M) and average daily gain (A) in the formula for RFI, but substituting the DMI with CPR. The correlation (r = 0.27) between RCPMA and RFI, though significantly different from zero, was not strong enough for its use as proxy for RFI. On the other hand, a strong correlation (r = 0.73) was obtained between the CPR to gain ratio (CGR) and FCR. This indicates that, where DMI is not available, CPR could be used in its place to compute a feed efficiency trait similar to FCR, since the computation of CGR was similar to that for FCR, except that DMI was substituted with CPR in the FCR formula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30060045      PMCID: PMC6247828          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle.

Authors:  P F Arthur; J A Archer; D J Johnston; R M Herd; E C Richardson; P F Parnell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle.

Authors:  J A Archer; P F Arthur; R M Herd; P F Parnell; W S Pitchford
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Optimizing test procedures for estimating daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions in cattle using short-term breath measures.

Authors:  P F Arthur; I M Barchia; C Weber; T Bird-Gardiner; K A Donoghue; R M Herd; R S Hegarty
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Feed intake of sheep when allowed ad libitum access to feed in methane respiration chambers.

Authors:  S L Bickell; D K Revell; A F Toovey; P E Vercoe
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Measurement of carbon dioxide production in sheep by isotope dilution.

Authors:  F G Whitelaw; J M Brockway; R S Reid
Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci       Date:  1972-01

6.  Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle.

Authors:  T Bird-Gardiner; P F Arthur; I M Barchia; K A Donoghue; R M Herd
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Cell Biology Symposium: genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  D P Berry; J J Crowley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Integrating spot short-term measurements of carbon emissions and backward dietary energy partition calculations to estimate intake in lactating dairy cows fed ad libitum or restricted.

Authors:  A B D Pereira; S A Utsumi; C D Dorich; A F Brito
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.034

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Hematology parameters as potential indicators of feed efficiency in pigs.

Authors:  Amanda K Lindholm-Perry; Larry A Kuehn; James E Wells; Lea A Rempel; Carol G Chitko-McKown; Brittney N Keel; William T Oliver
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-19

2.  Effects of diet on feed intake, weight change, and gas emissions in beef cows.

Authors:  Amanda L Holder; Megan A Gross; Alexandra N Moehlenpah; Carla L Goad; Megan Rolf; Ryon S Walker; James K Rogers; David L Lalman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emission of Beef Heifers in Relation with Growth and Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Gilles Renand; Aurélie Vinet; Virginie Decruyenaere; David Maupetit; Dominique Dozias
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Identification of Predictor Genes for Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle by Applying Machine Learning Methods to Multi-Tissue Transcriptome Data.

Authors:  Weihao Chen; Pâmela A Alexandre; Gabriela Ribeiro; Heidge Fukumasu; Wei Sun; Antonio Reverter; Yutao Li
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.599

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.