Literature DB >> 32978943

Relationships between feed efficiency and puberty in Bos taurus and Bos indicus-influenced replacement beef heifers.

Luara B Canal1, Pedro L P Fontes2, Carla D Sanford3, Vitor R G Mercadante4, Nicolas DiLorenzo2, G Cliff Lamb5, Nicola Oosthuizen5.   

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to investigate the relationship between residual feed intake (RFI) and parameters associated with reproductive efficiency in growing beef heifers. One hundred and seventy-nine replacement beef heifers (Bos taurus and Bos indicus-influenced) were enrolled in a retrospective cohort design. Heifers were assigned to a 70-d feed efficiency test, and results were utilized to retrospectively classify heifers into low (n = 51), medium (n = 66), or high (n = 62) RFI groups based on their individual RFI values. Blood samples were collected weekly throughout the feed efficiency test and breeding season, which were analyzed for plasma concentration of progesterone to determine age at puberty (PUB). By design, residual feed intake differed among RFI groups where high (1.21 ± 0.08 kg/d) had greater (P < 0.01) RFI than medium (0.00 ± 0.08 kg/d) and low RFI groups (-1.49 ± 0.09 kg/d), and medium had greater (P < 0.01) RFI than low RFI heifers. Yet, no differences were observed between breed types for RFI (P = 0.53). Average daily gain (ADG) differed between breed types where Bos taurus heifers had greater ADG (P = 0.02) than B. indicus-influenced heifers. Furthermore, ADG tended (P = 0.08) to differ among RFI groups, where medium RFI heifers tended to have reduced ADG compared with low and high RFI heifers. No differences were determined between breed types for gain-to-feed ratio (G:F; P = 0.20; however, G:F differed among RFI groups and was greater (P < 0.01) in low vs. high, and low vs. medium RFI heifers. The percentage of cycling heifers by the start of the breeding season differed (P = 0.03) by RFI group, where a greater percentage of low RFI heifers were cycling compared with high RFI heifers. A difference was determined on PUB between breed types (P = 0.03), where Bos taurus (393.40 ± 4.64 d) heifers had a reduced PUB compared with B. indicus-influenced (406.90 ± 5.07 d) heifers. In addition, PUB differed by RFI group where low (385.96 ± 6.20 d; P < 0.01) and medium (398.47 ± 5.47 d; P = 0.02) RFI heifers had a reduced PUB compared with High RFI heifers (416.03 ± 5.58 d). In conclusion, more feed efficient heifers attained PUB earlier than less feed efficient heifers. Therefore, selection of heifers for feed efficiency may positively impact reproductive performance of replacement beef heifers.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Bos indicus-influenced; zzm321990 Bos tauruszzm321990 ; Beef heifer; Feed efficiency; Puberty

Year:  2020        PMID: 32978943      PMCID: PMC7751194          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  20 in total

1.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle.

Authors:  P F Arthur; J A Archer; D J Johnston; R M Herd; E C Richardson; P F Parnell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Residual feed intake, body composition, and fertility in yearling beef heifers.

Authors:  K S Shaffer; P Turk; W R Wagner; E E D Felton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Creep-feeding to stimulate metabolic imprinting in nursing beef heifers: impacts on heifer growth, reproductive and physiological variables.

Authors:  M M Reis; R F Cooke; B I Cappellozza; R S Marques; T A Guarnieri Filho; M C Rodrigues; J S Bradley; C J Mueller; D H Keisler; S E Johnson; D W Bohnert
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Developmental and reproductive characteristics of beef heifers classified by pubertal status at time of first breeding.

Authors:  A J Roberts; A Gomes da Silva; A F Summers; T W Geary; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Heifer calving date positively influences calf weaning weights through six parturitions.

Authors:  R A Cushman; L K Kill; R N Funston; E M Mousel; G A Perry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Carcass composition in mature Hereford cows: estimation and effect on daily metabolizable energy requirement during winter.

Authors:  J J Wagner; K S Lusby; J W Oltjen; J Rakestraw; R P Wettemann; L E Walters
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers.

Authors:  A K Kelly; M McGee; D H Crews; A G Fahey; A R Wylie; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Relationships between postweaning residual feed intake in heifers and forage use, body composition, feeding behavior, physical activity, and heart rate of pregnant beef females.

Authors:  A N Hafla; G E Carstens; T D A Forbes; L O Tedeschi; J C Bailey; J T Walter; J R Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effect of breed composition on phenotypic residual feed intake and growth in Angus, Brahman, and Angus x Brahman crossbred cattle.

Authors:  M A Elzo; D G Riley; G R Hansen; D D Johnson; R O Myer; S W Coleman; C C Chase; J G Wasdin; J D Driver
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Relationships among performance, residual feed intake, and temperament assessed in growing beef heifers and subsequently as 3-year-old, lactating beef cows.

Authors:  T E Black; K M Bischoff; V R G Mercadante; G H L Marquezini; N Dilorenzo; C C Chase; S W Coleman; T D Maddock; G C Lamb
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  Population differentiated copy number variation of Bos taurus, Bos indicus and their African hybrids.

Authors:  Jisung Jang; Endashaw Terefe; Kwondo Kim; Young Ho Lee; Gurja Belay; Abdulfatai Tijjani; Jian-Lin Han; Olivier Hanotte; Heebal Kim
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.547

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.