Literature DB >> 29790937

Test duration for water intake, ADG, and DMI in beef cattle.

Cashley M Ahlberg1, Kristi Allwardt2, Ashley Broocks2, Kelsey Bruno2, Levi McPhillips2, Alexandra Taylor2, Clint R Krehbiel2,3, Michelle Calvo-Lorenzo2,4, Chris J Richards2, Sara E Place2,5, Udaya DeSilva2, Deborah L VanOverbeke2, Raluca G Mateescu6, Larry A Kuehn7, Robert L Weaber1, Jennifer M Bormann1, Megan M Rolf1.   

Abstract

Water is an essential nutrient, but the effect it has on performance generally receives little attention. There are few systems and guidelines for collection of water intake (WI) phenotypes in beef cattle, which makes large-scale research on WI a challenge. The Beef Improvement Federation has established guidelines for feed intake (FI) and ADG tests, but no guidelines exist for WI. The goal of this study was to determine the test duration necessary for collection of accurate WI phenotypes. To facilitate this goal, individual daily WI and FI records were collected on 578 crossbred steers for a total of 70 d using an Insentec system at the Oklahoma State University Willard Sparks Beef Research Unit. Steers were fed in five groups and were individually weighed every 14 d. Within each group, steers were blocked by BW (low and high) and randomly assigned to one of four pens containing approximately 30 steers per pen. Each pen provided 103.0 m2 of shade and included an Insentec system containing six feed bunks and one water bunk. Steers were fed a constant diet across groups and DMI was calculated using the average of weekly percent DM within group. Average FI and WI for each animal were computed for increasingly large test durations (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, and 70 d), and ADG was calculated using a regression formed from BW taken every 14 d (0, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70 d). Intervals for all traits were computed starting from both the beginning (day 0) and the end of the testing period (day 70). Pearson and Spearman correlations were computed for phenotypes from each shortened test period and for the full 70-d test. Minimum test duration was determined when the Pearson correlations were greater than 0.95 for each trait. Our results indicated that minimum test duration for WI, DMI, and ADG were 35, 42, and 70 d, respectively. No comparable studies exist for WI; however, our results for FI and ADG are consistent with those in the literature. Although further testing in other populations of cattle and areas of the country should take place, our results suggest that WI phenotypes can be collected concurrently with DMI, without extending test duration, even if following procedures for decoupled intake and gain tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29790937      PMCID: PMC6095348          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  15 in total

1.  Maintenance requirements of beef cattle as affected by season on different planes of nutrition.

Authors:  C P Birkelo; D E Johnson; H P Phetteplace
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System.

Authors:  Z Wang; J D Nkrumah; C Li; J A Basarab; L A Goonewardene; E K Okine; D H Crews; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of timing and duration of test period and diet type on intake and feed efficiency of Charolais-sired cattle.

Authors:  C J Cassady; T L Felix; J E Beever; D W Shike
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Technical note: Validation of an automated system for monitoring and restricting water intake in group-housed beef steers.

Authors:  K Allwardt; C Ahlberg; A Broocks; K Bruno; A Taylor; S Place; C Richards; C Krehbiel; M Calvo-Lorenzo; U DeSilva; D VanOverbeke; R Mateescu; C Goad; M M Rolf
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Factors influencing growth performance of beef bulls in a test station.

Authors:  M F Liu; M Makarechian
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genetic variance and covariance and breed differences for feed intake and average daily gain to improve feed efficiency in growing cattle.

Authors:  K J Retallick; J M Bormann; R L Weaber; M D MacNeil; H L Bradford; H C Freetly; K E Hales; D W Moser; W M Snelling; R M Thallman; L A Kuehn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Upper critical temperatures and forced ventilation effects for high-yielding dairy cows in a subtropical climate.

Authors:  A Berman; Y Folman; M Kaim; M Mamen; Z Herz; D Wolfenson; A Arieli; Y Graber
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Metabolic adaptations to heat stress in growing cattle.

Authors:  M D O'Brien; R P Rhoads; S R Sanders; G C Duff; L H Baumgard
Journal:  Domest Anim Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.290

9.  Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring individual feeding and drinking behavior and intake in group-housed cattle.

Authors:  N Chapinal; D M Veira; D M Weary; M A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Effects of heat stress on energetic metabolism in lactating Holstein cows.

Authors:  J B Wheelock; R P Rhoads; M J Vanbaale; S R Sanders; L H Baumgard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characterization of water intake and water efficiency in beef cattle1,2.

Authors:  Cashley M Ahlberg; Kristi Allwardt; Ashley Broocks; Kelsey Bruno; Alexandra Taylor; Levi Mcphillips; Clint R Krehbiel; Michelle Calvo-Lorenzo; Chris J Richards; Sara E Place; Udaya Desilva; Deborah L Vanoverbeke; Raluca G Mateescu; Larry A Kuehn; Robert Weaber; Jennifer Bormann; Megan M Rolf
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Evaluation of test duration for feed efficiency in growing beef cattle.

Authors:  Milena Zigart Marzocchi; Leandro Sannomiya Sakamoto; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Joslaine Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  A Smart Sensing System of Water Quality and Intake Monitoring for Livestock and Wild Animals.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Amin Biglari; Ryan Ebarb; Tee Pickett; Samuel Smallidge; Marcy Ward
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.