Literature DB >> 27620867

Variability in residual feed intake and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo heifers.

Tegene Negesse1, Chander Datt2, S S Kundu2.   

Abstract

A feeding trial with 18 Murrah buffalo heifers (238 ± 63 kg; 1.7 ± 0.4 years old) was conducted for 57 days, and feed intake and body weight were recorded followed by 7 days of urine and feces collection. Heifers were grouped into low (RFI-I) and high (RFI-II) feed efficiency groups by regressing DMI (g head-1 day-1) on BWG (g head-1 day-1) and mid-test MBW (kg). RFI-II heifers had slightly higher DMI (g head-1 day-1 and expressed per unit of BW, %BW, MBW, mid-test BW, and mid-test MBW) and all associated nutrient intakes, BWG, feed efficiency traits (FCR, CPCR), digestibility of nutrients, and retentions of crude protein and fat over RFI-I heifers. The corresponding intake values (kg head-1 day-1) for RFI-I versus RFI-II were the following: DMI (6.73 ± 0.56 vs 6.51 ± 0.50), CPI (0.99 ± 0.008 vs 0.97 ± 0.07), DOMI (5.06 ± 0.47 vs 5.11 ± 0.42), and TDNI (4.95 ± 0.47 vs 5.00 ± 0.42). BWG (669 ± 52 vs 776 ± 47 g head-1 day-1), feed efficiency traits (FCR: 10.32 ± 1.16 vs 8.77 ± 1.04 and CPCR: 1.52 ± 0.17 vs 1.30 ± 0.16), N balance (38 ± 9 vs 45 ± 8 g N head-1 day-1), and protein and fat retentions (239 ± 57 vs 282 ± 51 g CP head-1 day-1 and 430 ± 6 vs 494 ± 59 g fat head-1 day-1) of RFI-I were less than RFI-II heifers, respectively. Based on the predicted RFI values, RFI-II buffalo heifers could be selected for feed efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nutrient efficiency; Nutrient retention; Predictability of performance; Selection of animals

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27620867     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-016-1130-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  8 in total

1.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle.

Authors:  P F Arthur; J A Archer; D J Johnston; R M Herd; E C Richardson; P F Parnell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Feed efficiency differences and reranking in beef steers fed grower and finisher diets.

Authors:  O N Durunna; F D N Mujibi; L Goonewardene; E K Okine; J A Basarab; Z Wang; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle.

Authors:  J A Archer; P F Arthur; R M Herd; P F Parnell; W S Pitchford
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behavior, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake.

Authors:  A K Kelly; M McGee; D H Crews; T Sweeney; T M Boland; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Energy requirements for maintenance of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk.

Authors:  M Montaño-Bermudez; M K Nielsen; G H Deutscher
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Cow type and the nutritional environment: nutritional aspects.

Authors:  C L Ferrell; T G Jenkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Cell Biology Symposium: genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  D P Berry; J J Crowley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.159

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.