Literature DB >> 20085200

An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears.

Richard S Tyler1, Shelley A Witt, Camille C Dunn, Ann Perreau, Aaron J Parkinson, Blake S Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to determine if adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients could benefit from using a speech processing strategy in which the input spectrum was interleaved among electrodes across the two implants.
DESIGN: Two separate experiments were conducted. In both experiments, subjects were tested using a control speech processing strategy and a strategy in which the full input spectrum was filtered so that only the output of half of the filters was audible to one implant, while the output of the alternative filters was audible to the other implant. The filters were interleaved in a way that created alternate frequency "holes" between the two cochlear implants.
RESULTS: In experiment one, four subjects were tested on consonant recognition. Results indicated that one of the four subjects performed better with the interleaved strategy, one subject received a binaural advantage with the interleaved strategy that they did not receive with the control strategy, and two subjects showed no decrement in performance when using the interleaved strategy. In the second experiment, 11 subjects were tested on word recognition, sentences in noise, and localization (it should be noted that not all subjects participated in all tests). Results showed that for speech perception testing one subject achieved significantly better scores with the interleaved strategy on all tests, and seven subjects showed a significant improvement with the interleaved strategy on at least one test. Only one subject showed a decrement in performance on all speech perception tests with the interleaved strategy. Out of nine subjects, one subject preferred the sound quality of the interleaved strategy. No one performed better on localization with the interleaved strategy.
CONCLUSION: Data from this study indicate that some adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients can benefit from using a speech processing strategy in which the input spectrum is interleaved among electrodes across the two implants. It is possible that the subjects in this study who showed a significant improvement with the interleaved strategy did so because of less channel interaction; however, this hypothesis was not directly tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20085200      PMCID: PMC2857406          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.1.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  40 in total

1.  Dichotic speech recognition in noise using reduced spectral cues.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Arunvijay Mani; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing aid types on the ability to locate sounds.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble; B LePage
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Carl A Verschuur; Mark E Lutman; Richard Ramsden; Paula Greenham; Martin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors.

Authors:  Pascal Senn; Martin Kompis; Mattheus Vischer; Rudolf Haeusler
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Shelley A Witt; William G Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Sarah Oakley; Bruce J Gantz; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners.

Authors:  J Peissig; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Music Therapy for Preschool Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst
Journal:  Music Ther Perspect       Date:  2011-06

2.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski; John F Knutson; Christopher Turner; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2012

4.  Localization training results in individuals with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Noël Y Dwyer; Harold Burton; Laura K Holden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The effect of interleaved filters on normal hearing listeners' perception of binaural cues.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Akiko Amano-Kusumoto; Motokuni Itoh; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: speech perception and localization pre- and post-second cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Shelley Witt; Haihong Ji; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Julia Stelmach; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches.

Authors:  Tom Humphries; Poorna Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann; Scott R Smith
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2012-04-02

9.  Learning to find spatially reversed sounds.

Authors:  Fernando Bermejo; Ezequiel A Di Paolo; L Guillermo Gilberto; Valentín Lunati; M Virginia Barrios
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.