Literature DB >> 9224300

New onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: age related incidence and prediction by intrarenal resistive index.

G Janetschek1, F Frauscher, R Knapp, G Höfle, R Peschel, G Bartsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a recent study we found an increased resistive index immediately after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients older than 60 years, which suggests renovascular disturbance. The present 26-month followup study was undertaken to investigate the relevance of elevated resistive index levels and the incidence of new onset hypertension.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the initial 76 patients 57, including 20 of the 23 at risk patients 60 or greater years, group 3), were followed for more than 26 +/- 6 months after ESWL. Followup included 2 resistive index measurements by Doppler ultrasound of the treated and the contralateral kidney, at least 2 blood pressure measurements 1 week apart and excretory urography as well as determination of plasma renin activity in 9 patients.
RESULTS: With 1 exception, elevated resistive index levels and hypertension were observed exclusively in patients older than 60 years. In these patients the resistive index ranged between 0.65 and 0.86 (mean plus or minus standard deviation 0.74 +/- 0.05, normal less than 0.7). This increase in resistive index was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Compared to the levels obtained immediately after ESWL, the resistive index continued to increase in all 9 patients older than 60 years who had hypertension (45%), whereas in the normotensive patients the resistive index was either stable or decreased. There was a strong positive correlation (0.903) between pathological resistive index levels and blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 60 years are at risk for disturbances of renal perfusion as assessed by the resistive index, and 45% of these patients have new onset hypertension within 26 months of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9224300     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64475-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  31 in total

Review 1.  Estimating the effectiveness of various methods of evacuation of kidney stones, on the basis of data obtained on percentage of "stone free" and recurrent stone formation.

Authors:  V M Bilobrov; A Roy; S V Bilobrov
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Kuddusi Pancaroglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-10

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy is not predictive of hypertension among community stone formers at long-term followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Detection of significant variation in acoustic output of an electromagnetic lithotriptor.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; R Jason Vonderhaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 6.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Cui Yu; Liu Longfei; Wang Long; Zeng Feng; Niu Jiping; Li Mao; Qi Lin; Chen Hequn
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Electromagnetic and Electrohydraulic Shock Wave Lithotripsy-Induced Urothelial Damage: Is There a Difference?

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Honood Aburas; Fatima M Helo; Lailah Qarawi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Nadine B Smith; Michael R Bailey; Gregory J Czarnota; Kullervo Hynynen; Inder Raj S Makin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.