Literature DB >> 22441920

Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations.

Douglas L Miller1, Nadine B Smith, Michael R Bailey, Gregory J Czarnota, Kullervo Hynynen, Inder Raj S Makin.   

Abstract

Applications of ultrasound in medicine for therapeutic purposes have been accepted and beneficial uses of ultrasonic biological effects for many years. Low-power ultrasound of about 1 MHz has been widely applied since the 1950s for physical therapy in conditions such as tendinitis and bursitis. In the 1980s, high-pressure-amplitude shock waves came into use for mechanically resolving kidney stones, and "lithotripsy" rapidly replaced surgery as the most frequent treatment choice. The use of ultrasonic energy for therapy continues to expand, and approved applications now include uterine fibroid ablation, cataract removal (phacoemulsification), surgical tissue cutting and hemostasis, transdermal drug delivery, and bone fracture healing, among others. Undesirable bioeffects can occur, including burns from thermal-based therapies and severe hemorrhage from mechanical-based therapies (eg, lithotripsy). In all of these therapeutic applications of ultrasound bioeffects, standardization, ultrasound dosimetry, benefits assurance, and side-effect risk minimization must be carefully considered to ensure an optimal benefit to risk ratio for the patient. Therapeutic ultrasound typically has well-defined benefits and risks and therefore presents a manageable safety problem to the clinician. However, safety information can be scattered, confusing, or subject to commercial conflicts of interest. Of paramount importance for managing this problem is the communication of practical safety information by authoritative groups, such as the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, to the medical ultrasound community. In this overview, the Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine outlines the wide range of therapeutic ultrasound methods, which are in clinical use or under study, and provides general guidance for ensuring therapeutic ultrasound safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441920      PMCID: PMC3810427          DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  84 in total

1.  Determination of the acoustic output of a harmonic scalpel.

Authors:  Christian Koch; Michael Borys; Thomas Fedtke; Utz Richter; Bernd Pöhl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: effects on nonunions.

Authors:  Dieter Gebauer; Edgar Mayr; Ernst Orthner; John P Ryaby
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review.

Authors:  William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini; Bryant J Staples
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.648

4.  Selective creation of thermal injury zones in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system using intense ultrasound therapy: a new target for noninvasive facial rejuvenation.

Authors:  W Matthew White; Inder Raj S Makin; Peter G Barthe; Michael H Slayton; Richard E Gliklich
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

5.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for stroke therapy: better thrombus break-up with bubbles.

Authors:  Kathryn E Hitchcock; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Refining histotripsy: defining the parameter space for the creation of nonthermal lesions with high intensity, pulsed focused ultrasound of the in vitro kidney.

Authors:  Kathleen Kieran; Timothy L Hall; Jessica E Parsons; J Stuart Wolf; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine consensus report on potential bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound: executive summary.

Authors:  J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Microbubbles as ultrasound triggered drug carriers.

Authors:  Steliyan Tinkov; Raffi Bekeredjian; Gerhard Winter; Conrad Coester
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Transurethral ultrasound applicators with dynamic multi-sector control for prostate thermal therapy: in vivo evaluation under MR guidance.

Authors:  Adam M Kinsey; Chris J Diederich; Viola Rieke; William H Nau; Kim Butts Pauly; Donna Bouley; Graham Sommer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  116 in total

Review 1.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery in musculoskeletal diseases: the hot topics.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Alessandro Napoli; Beatrice Sacconi; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Carlo Catalano; Ugo Albisinni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Biophysical Approaches for Oral Wound Healing: Emphasis on Photobiomodulation.

Authors:  Imran Khan; Praveen Arany
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Applicability and safety of dual-frequency ultrasonic treatment for the transdermal delivery of drugs.

Authors:  Carl M Schoellhammer; Sharanya Srinivasan; Ross Barman; Stacy H Mo; Baris E Polat; Robert Langer; Daniel Blankschtein
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion.

Authors:  Marshall Mahoney; Anna Sorace; Jason Warram; Sharon Samuel; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Energy shielding by cavitation bubble clouds in burst wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Kazuki Maeda; Adam D Maxwell; Tim Colonius; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vibration enhanced cell growth induced by surface acoustic waves as in vitro wound-healing model.

Authors:  Manuel S Brugger; Kathrin Baumgartner; Sophie C F Mauritz; Stefan C Gerlach; Florian Röder; Christine Schlosser; Regina Fluhrer; Achim Wixforth; Christoph Westerhausen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Frequency-induced morphology alterations in microconfined biological cells.

Authors:  Hritwick Banerjee; Bibhas Roy; Kaustav Chaudhury; Babji Srinivasan; Suman Chakraborty; Hongliang Ren
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Sustained Acoustic Medicine: A Novel Long Duration Approach to Biomodulation Utilizing Low Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Matthew D Langer; George K Lewis
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-05

9.  In Situ Transfection by Controlled Release of Lipoplexes Using Acoustic Droplet Vaporization.

Authors:  Benjamin A Juliar; Melissa M Bromley; Alexander Moncion; Denise C Jones; Eric G O'Neill; Christopher G Wilson; Renny T Franceschi; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 9.933

10.  A high-throughput acoustic cell sorter.

Authors:  Liqiang Ren; Yuchao Chen; Peng Li; Zhangming Mao; Po-Hsun Huang; Joseph Rufo; Feng Guo; Lin Wang; J Philip McCoy; Stewart J Levine; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.