Literature DB >> 19956196

Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

James E Lingeman1, James A McAteer, Ehud Gnessin, Andrew P Evan.   

Abstract

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is the only noninvasive method for stone removal. Once considered as a primary option for the treatment of virtually all stones, SWL is now recognized to have important limitations that restrict its use. In particular, the effectiveness of SWL is severely limited by stone burden, and treatment with shock waves carries the risk of acute injury with the potential for long-term adverse effects. Research aiming to characterize the renal response to shock waves and to determine the mechanisms of shock wave action in stone breakage and renal injury has begun to suggest new treatment strategies to improve success rates and safety. Urologists can achieve better outcomes by treating at slower shock wave rate using a step-wise protocol. The aim is to achieve stone comminution using as few shock waves and at as low a power level as possible. Important challenges remain, including the need to improve acoustic coupling, enhance stone targeting, better determine when stone breakage is complete, and minimize the occurrence of residual stone fragments. New technologies have begun to address many of these issues, and hold considerable promise for the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19956196      PMCID: PMC2923385          DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  90 in total

1.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The clinical implications of brushite calculi.

Authors:  L W Klee; C G Brito; J E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?

Authors:  Job Chacko; Michael Moore; Noel Sankey; Paramjit S Chandhoke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Physician ownership of ambulatory surgery centers and practice patterns for urological surgery: evidence from the state of Florida.

Authors:  Seth A Strope; Stephanie Daignault; John M Hollingsworth; Zaojun Ye; John T Wei; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  T B Mobley; D A Myers; W B Grine; J M Jenkins; W R Jordan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Comparison of 2 generations of piezoelectric lithotriptors using matched pair analysis.

Authors:  C F Ng; L McLornan; T J Thompson; D A Tolley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Ultrasound Technology in the Management of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jessica C Dai; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Nathan B Smith; Georgy N Sankin; Walter N Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A heuristic model of stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Nathan B Smith; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Micro-ultrasonic cleaving of cell clusters by laser-generated focused ultrasound and its mechanisms.

Authors:  Hyoung Won Baac; Taehwa Lee; L Jay Guo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Shock-Induced Damage and Dynamic Fracture in Cylindrical Bodies Submerged in Liquid.

Authors:  S Cao; Y Zhang; D Liao; P Zhong; K G Wang
Journal:  Int J Solids Struct       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.900

6.  Single-shot measurements of the acoustic field of an electrohydraulic lithotripter using a hydrophone array.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alibakhshi; Jonathan M Kracht; Robin O Cleveland; Erwan Filoux; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Editorial Comment on: The Impact of Dust and Confinement on Fragmentation of Kidney Stones by Shockwave Lithotripsy in Tissue Phantoms by Randad et al. (From: Randad A, Ahn J, Bailey MR, et al. J Endourol 2019;33:400-406; DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0516).

Authors:  Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Energy shielding by cavitation bubble clouds in burst wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Kazuki Maeda; Adam D Maxwell; Tim Colonius; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.

Authors:  Yifei Xing; Tony T Chen; Walter N Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Franklin H Cocks; Michael E Lipkin; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.