Literature DB >> 21063696

Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Mahmoud Mustafa1, Kuddusi Pancaroglu.   

Abstract

Our aim is to study the prospective trial where urine cytology was used to detect the acute urothelial mucosal damage in patients who undergo extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy (SWL). The study included 48 consecutive patients (28 male, 20 female) with mean age of 49.02 years (range 18-66) who were treated with SWL due to renal stones (30 patients) or upper ureter stones (18 patients). The mean calculi diameter was 12.44 mm (range 5-20). Urinary cytologic examinations were done for all patients immediately before and after SWL therapy and 10 days latter. The average numbers of transitional cells, red blood cells and myocytes were counted under 40 × magnification. In overall patients the average numbers of transitional cells at the cytologic examinations done immediately before and after SWL therapy were 1.6 and 7.53 cell/field, respectively (p = 0.001). The increment in transitional cells at cytologic examination after SWL was significantly influenced only by number of shock waves applied (p = 0.003). No muscle cell was detected in all cytologic examinations. The cytologic examinations which were done after 10 days of SWL therapy showed recovery from all cytologic abnormalities. The acute increment in number of transitional cells after the SWL is not clinically important and it is a temporary change. Urothelial lesion is limited to mucosal layer and there is no evidence of damage to basal membrane or deeper muscle layer. SWL safety on urothelial and muscular layer was demonstrated. However, evaluation of larger series with use of other lithotripters is necessary before reaching any definitive conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21063696     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0339-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  23 in total

1.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. 1981.

Authors:  Christian Chaussy; Egbert Schmiedt; Dieter Jocham; Walter Brendel; Bernd Forssmann; Volker Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL.

Authors:  L A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and other forms of treatment for nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; J R Woods; P D Toth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  G W Drach; S Dretler; W Fair; B Finlayson; J Gillenwater; D Griffith; J Lingeman; D Newman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Changes in resistive index following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Y Aoki; S Ishitoya; K Okubo; T Okada; S Maekawa; H Maeda; Y Arai
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on the structure and function of rabbit kidney.

Authors:  S Gunasekaran; J M Donovan; M Chvapil; G W Drach
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  [Long-term evaluation with DMSA-Tc 99m scintigraphy of renal parenchymal involvement in children after shockwave extracorporeal lithotripsy].

Authors:  O Traxer; H Lottmann; F Archambaud; B Helal; B Mercier Pageyral
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.915

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy induces the release of prostaglandins which increase ureteric peristalsis.

Authors:  P G Horgan; D Hanley; J Burke; N F Couse; J M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-06

Review 10.  The role of lithotripsy and its side effects.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; J Woods; P D Toth; A P Evan; J A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Electromagnetic and Electrohydraulic Shock Wave Lithotripsy-Induced Urothelial Damage: Is There a Difference?

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Honood Aburas; Fatima M Helo; Lailah Qarawi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Bora Irer; Mehmet Oguz Sahin; Oguzcan Erbatu; Alperen Yildiz; Sakir Ongun; Onder Cinar; Ahmet Cihan; Mehmet Sahin; Volkan Sen; Oktay Ucer; Fuat Kizilay; Ozan Bozkurt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm.

Authors:  Feng Yao; XiaoLiang Jiang; Bin Xie; Ning Liu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.