Literature DB >> 18523751

[Lower pole calyceal stones].

U Nagele1, T Knoll, D Schilling, M S Michel, A Stenzl.   

Abstract

Due to its particular anatomical position below the ureteropelvic junction, the lower pole group of calices plays a special role in the treatment of nephrolithiasis. The extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) often attains dissatisfactory stone-free rates, even after optimal disintegration of lower pole stones, and thus necessitates secondary therapeutic procedures. Due to the favorable stone-free rates, retrograde intrarenal surgery with its low complication rate has taken up an important role in the treatment of lower pole stones since the development of modern flexible ureterorenoscopes. The long treatment times in the case of a large stone burden and considerable costs for materials constitute limiting factors. In line with the advancement of percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL), a promising method also for the treatment of larger lower pole stones is available today with minimally invasive PCNL (MIP).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18523751     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1780-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  32 in total

1.  Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  J W Collins; F X Keeley; A Timoney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; David Schilling; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Stefan Corvin; Jörg Seibold; Markus Kuczyk; Arnulf Stenzl; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  [Current aspects of stone therapy].

Authors:  T Knoll; G Wendt-Nordahl; L Trojan; A Wenke; N Roeder; P Alken
Journal:  Aktuelle Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.658

Review 4.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Treatment of caliceal calculi.

Authors:  W Hübner; P Porpaczy
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1990-07

6.  Flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with in situ lithotripsy for lower pole calculi.

Authors:  B K Hollenbeck; T G Schuster; G J Faerber; J S Wolf
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Nambirajan; Stephan Jeschke; Nasser Albqami; Firas Abukora; Karl Leeb; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K T Pace; N Tariq; S J Dyer; M J Weir; R J D'A Honey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Authors:  Brian K Auge; Paul K Pietrow; Costas D Lallas; Ganesh V Raj; Robert W Santa-Cruz; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience.

Authors:  Anno Graser; Thorsten R C Johnson; Markus Bader; Michael Staehler; Nicolas Haseke; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian G Stief; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Calyceal stones].

Authors:  C Netsch; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery using a laparoendoscopic training box: the sandwich model.

Authors:  Stephan Jutzi; Florian Imkamp; Markus A Kuczyk; Ute Walcher; Udo Nagele; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Implementation of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): comparison of the initial learning curve with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre.

Authors:  T Bergmann; T R W Herrmann; Th Schiller; U Zimmermann; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Role of low- versus high-power laser in the treatment of lower pole stones: prospective non-randomized outcomes from a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Amelia Pietropaolo; Mriganka Mani; Thomas Hughes; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-05-26

5.  [Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP)].

Authors:  U Nagele; D Schilling; A G Anastasiadis; U Walcher; K D Sievert; A S Merseburger; M Kuczyk; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Petrisor Geavlete; Razvan Multescu; Bogdan Geavlete
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Diuresis and inversion therapy to improve clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy: A prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical study.

Authors:  Abul-Fotouh Ahmed; Essam Shalaby; Aref Maarouf; Yasser Badran; Mahmoud Eladl; Ammar Ghobish
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

8.  Managing caliceal stones.

Authors:  Andreas J Gross; Sophie Knipper; Christopher Netsch
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.