Literature DB >> 12092650

Estimating the effectiveness of various methods of evacuation of kidney stones, on the basis of data obtained on percentage of "stone free" and recurrent stone formation.

V M Bilobrov1, A Roy, S V Bilobrov.   

Abstract

Using the materials of more than 200 scientific papers of recent years in this review it has been carried out analysis of the effectiveness and also discussed the merits and demerits of various methods of treatment of urinary stone diseases (USD). With this purpose, for the first time it has been carried out analysis of treatment quality of USD using more important quantitative parameters of treatment efficacy: 1--percentage of "stone free"; 2--percentage of recurrent stone formation. It has been emphasized on the higher effectiveness of treatment in combination of the method of ESWL with the methods of ascending litholysis. It was shown that in order to solve problems such as etiology and pathogenesis of the disease, elaboration of quantitative risk factors of the disease, and search for effective measures on pro- and metaphylaxis of USD, and also elaboration of various (including therapeutics) medium and methods for complete and rapid evacuation of stones, it is needed to carry out intensively fundamental and applied researches in the field of urinary stone diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12092650     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015282526252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  67 in total

Review 1.  Treatment update on pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  T Esen; A Krautschick; P Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Quality of semen after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower urethral stones.

Authors:  R Andreessen; M Fedel; F Sudhoff; R Friedrichs; S A Loening
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The necessity of prophylactic antibiotics during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C Deliveliotis; A Giftopoulos; G Koutsokalis; G Raptidis; A Kostakopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Treatment options for distal ureteral stones.

Authors:  J A Boulier; P Laguna; R P Parra
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 0.436

5.  Serum interleukin-6 levels after urologic operations.

Authors:  T Igarashi; H Takahashi; M Tanaka; S Murakami
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Treatment of cystine stones: combined approach using open pyelolithotomy, percutaneous pyelolithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis.

Authors:  J Aabech; J T Andersen
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1993

7.  Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi.

Authors:  V Kumar; R Ahlawat; G K Banjeree; R P Bhaduria; A Elhence; M Bhandari
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.436

8.  Long-term stone recurrence rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  O Kamihira; Y Ono; N Katoh; S Yamada; K Mizutani; S Ohshima
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Complete staghorn calculi: random prospective comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy and combined with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  S Meretyk; O N Gofrit; O Gafni; D Pode; A Shapiro; A Verstandig; T Sasson; G Katz; E H Landau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Effect of medical management and residual fragments on recurrent stone formation following shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J K Fine; C Y Pak; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.