Literature DB >> 2229672

Discrimination of modulation depth of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) noise.

G H Wakefield1, N F Viemeister.   

Abstract

The detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) provides a lower bound on the degree to which temporal information in the envelope of complex waveforms is encoded by the auditory system. The extent to which changes in the amount of modulation are discriminable provides additional information on the ability of the auditory system to utilize envelope fluctuations. Results from an experiment on the discrimination of modulation depth of broadband noise are presented. Discrimination thresholds, expressed as differences in modulation power, increase monotonically with the modulation depth of the standard, but do not obey Weber's law. The effects of carrier level and of modulation frequency are consistent with those observed in modulation detection: Changes in carrier level have little effect on modulation discrimination; changes in modulation frequency also have little effect except for standards near the modulation detection threshold. The discrimination of modulation depth is consistent with the leaky-integrator model of modulation detection for standards below--10 dB (20 log ms); for standards greater than--10 dB, the leaky integrator predicts better performance than that observed behaviorally.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2229672     DOI: 10.1121/1.399714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influences of modulation and spatial separation on detection of a masked broadband target.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Discrimination of temporally asymmetric modulation with triangular envelopes on a broadband-noise carrier (L).

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Amplitude modulation depth discrimination of a sinusoidal carrier: effect of stimulus duration.

Authors:  J Lee; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory distance coding in rabbit midbrain neurons and human perception: monaural amplitude modulation depth as a cue.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney; Brian B Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural Variability Limits Adolescent Skill Learning.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Holger Dierker; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-10

9.  Detection of modulated tones in modulated noise by non-human primates.

Authors:  Peter Bohlen; Margit Dylla; Courtney Timms; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-05

10.  Sustained Perceptual Deficits from Transient Sensory Deprivation.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.