Literature DB >> 21457768

Amplitude modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency and stimulus duration: comparisons between macaques and humans.

Kevin N O'Connor1, Jeffrey S Johnson, Mamiko Niwa, Nigel C Noriega, Elizabeth A Marshall, Mitchell L Sutter.   

Abstract

Previous observations show that humans outperform non-human primates on some temporally-based auditory discrimination tasks, suggesting there are species differences in the proficiency of auditory temporal processing among primates. To further resolve these differences we compared the abilities of rhesus macaques and humans to detect sine-amplitude modulation (AM) of a broad-band noise carrier as a function of both AM frequency (2.5 Hz-2 kHz) and signal duration (50-800 ms), under similar testing conditions. Using a go/no-go AM detection task, we found that macaques were less sensitive than humans at the lower frequencies and shorter durations tested but were as, or slightly more, sensitive at higher frequencies and longer durations. Humans had broader AM tuning functions, with lower frequency regions of peak sensitivity (10-60 Hz) than macaques (30-120 Hz). These results support the notion that there are species differences in temporal processing among primates, and underscore the importance of stimulus duration when making cross-species comparisons for temporally-based tasks.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457768      PMCID: PMC3418142          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  35 in total

1.  Auditory intensity discrimination in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  R J Dooling; J C Saunders
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  Michael L Dent; Georg M Klump; Christian Schwenzfeier
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency-modulated tones.

Authors:  R H Kay; D R Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Effect of signal duration on the auditory sensitivity of humans and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  T D Clack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory intensity discrimination in the rat.

Authors:  M H Hack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1971-02

6.  Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys.

Authors:  B M Clopton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Acoustic intensity limens in the goldfish.

Authors:  D W Jacobs; W N Tavolga
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1967 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Effects of caloric restriction and aging on the auditory function of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): The University of Wisconsin Study.

Authors:  Cynthia G Fowler; Peter Torre; Joseph W Kemnitz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats.

Authors:  M Terman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Some auditory discrimination experiments on marine fish.

Authors:  C J Chapman; A D Johnstone
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  23 in total

1.  Ability of primary auditory cortical neurons to detect amplitude modulation with rate and temporal codes: neurometric analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Pingbo Yin; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Hierarchical differences in population coding within auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; Mamiko Niwa; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A Decline in Response Variability Improves Neural Signal Detection during Auditory Task Performance.

Authors:  Gardiner von Trapp; Bradley N Buran; Kamal Sen; Malcolm N Semple; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Task engagement selectively modulates neural correlations in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; Mamiko Niwa; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Detection of tones and their modification by noise in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Margit Dylla; Andrew Hrnicek; Christopher Rice; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-21

8.  Activity related to perceptual judgment and action in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mamiko Niwa; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Feature-Selective Attention Adaptively Shifts Noise Correlations in Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; Brittany Rapone; Jessica Verhein; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Detection thresholds for amplitude modulations of tones in budgerigar, rabbit, and human.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Angela D Ketterer; Kristina S Abrams; Douglas M Schwarz; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.