Literature DB >> 20071542

Temporal codes for amplitude contrast in auditory cortex.

Brian J Malone1, Brian H Scott, Malcolm N Semple.   

Abstract

The encoding of sound level is fundamental to auditory signal processing, and the temporal information present in amplitude modulation is crucial to the complex signals used for communication sounds, including human speech. The modulation transfer function, which measures the minimum detectable modulation depth across modulation frequency, has been shown to predict speech intelligibility performance in a range of adverse listening conditions and hearing impairments, and even for users of cochlear implants. We presented sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) tones of varying modulation depths to awake macaque monkeys while measuring the responses of neurons in the auditory core. Using spike train classification methods, we found that thresholds for modulation depth detection and discrimination in the most sensitive units are comparable to psychophysical thresholds when precise temporal discharge patterns rather than average firing rates are considered. Moreover, spike timing information was also superior to average rate information when discriminating static pure tones varying in level but with similar envelopes. The limited utility of average firing rate information in many units also limited the utility of standard measures of sound level tuning, such as the rate level function (RLF), in predicting cortical responses to dynamic signals like SAM. Response modulation typically exceeded that predicted by the slope of the RLF by large factors. The decoupling of the cortical encoding of SAM and static tones indicates that enhancing the representation of acoustic contrast is a cardinal feature of the ascending auditory pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20071542      PMCID: PMC3551278          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4170-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  56 in total

1.  Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.

Authors:  L Geurts; J Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats.

Authors:  R L Snyder; M Vollmer; C M Moore; S J Rebscher; P A Leake; R E Beitel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cortical representation of auditory space: information-bearing features of spike patterns.

Authors:  Shigeto Furukawa; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural representations of sinusoidal amplitude and frequency modulations in the primary auditory cortex of awake primates.

Authors:  Li Liang; Thomas Lu; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Context-dependent adaptive coding of interaural phase disparity in the auditory cortex of awake macaques.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  29 in total

1.  Ability of primary auditory cortical neurons to detect amplitude modulation with rate and temporal codes: neurometric analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Pingbo Yin; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Transformation of temporal processing across auditory cortex of awake macaques.

Authors:  Brian H Scott; Brian J Malone; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Suboptimal use of neural information in a mammalian auditory system.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Muhammad S A Zilany; Nicholas J Huang; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Modulation-frequency-specific adaptation in awake auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marc A Heiser; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Diverse cortical codes for scene segmentation in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Seasonal plasticity of precise spike timing in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Kamal Sen; Edwin W Rubel; Eliot A Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Background noise exerts diverse effects on the cortical encoding of foreground sounds.

Authors:  B J Malone; Marc A Heiser; Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Hierarchical differences in population coding within auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; Mamiko Niwa; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.