Literature DB >> 17471731

Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Paul C Nelson1, Stephan D Ewert, Laurel H Carney, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

In general, the temporal structure of stimuli must be considered to account for certain observations made in detection and masking experiments in the audio-frequency domain. Two such phenomena are (1) a heightened sensitivity to amplitude increments with a temporal fringe compared to gated level discrimination performance and (2) lower tone-in-noise detection thresholds using a modulated masker compared to those using an unmodulated masker. In the current study, translations of these two experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that analogous cues might be used in the envelope-frequency domain. Pure-tone carrier amplitude-modulation (AM) depth-discrimination thresholds were found to be similar using both traditional gated stimuli and using a temporally modulated fringe for a fixed standard depth (ms = 0.25) and a range of AM frequencies (4-64 Hz). In a second experiment, masked sinusoidal AM detection thresholds were compared in conditions with and without slow and regular fluctuations imposed on the instantaneous masker AM depth. Release from masking was obtained only for very slow masker fluctuations (less than 2 Hz). A physiologically motivated model that effectively acts as a first-order envelope change detector accounted for several, but not all, of the key aspects of the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471731      PMCID: PMC2572867          DOI: 10.1121/1.2535868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  61 in total

1.  Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  M Wojtczak; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the role of envelope fluctuation processing in spectral masking.

Authors:  R P Derleth; T Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Short-term adaptation and incremental responses of single auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Smith; J J Zwislocki
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Jesko L Verhey; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Forward masking of amplitude modulation: basic characteristics.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some implications of the stochastic behavior of primary auditory neurons.

Authors:  W M Siebert
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1965-06

8.  Intensity discrimination and increment detection at 16 kHz.

Authors:  S P Bacon; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Midbrain local circuits shape sound intensity codes.

Authors:  Calum Alex Grimsley; Jason Tait Sanchez; Shobhana Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.492

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.