Literature DB >> 9113869

Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant and length of device use.

H Fryauf-Bertschy1, R S Tyler, D M Kelsay, B J Gantz, G G Woodworth.   

Abstract

This study focused on long-term speech perception performances of 34 prelingually deafened children who received multichannel cochlear implants manufactured by Cochlear Corporation. The children were grouped by the age at which they received cochlear implants and were characterized by the amount of time they used their device per day. A variety of speech perception tests were administered to the children at annual intervals following the connection of the external implant hardware. No significant differences in performance are evident for children implanted before age 5 compared to children implanted after age 5 on closed-set tests of speech perception ability. All children demonstrated an improvement in performance compared to the pre-operative condition. Open-set word recognition performance is significantly better for children implanted before age 5 compared to children implanted after age 5 at the 36-month test interval and the 48-month test interval. User status, defined by the amount of daily use of the implant, significantly affects all measures of speech perception performance except pattern perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9113869     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4001.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  62 in total

1.  Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification.

Authors:  S A Frisch; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Some computational analyses of the PBK test: effects of frequency and lexical density on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  T A Meyer; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.

Authors:  J B Tomblin; L Spencer; S Flock; R Tyler; B Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.

Authors:  L Lachs; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

8.  Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Cleary; D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The production of English inflectional morphology, speech production and listening performance in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  L J Spencer; N Tye-Murray; J B Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Working memory in children with cochlear implants: problems are in storage, not processing.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.