Literature DB >> 9728726

The production of English inflectional morphology, speech production and listening performance in children with cochlear implants.

L J Spencer1, N Tye-Murray, J B Tomblin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare how children who use either cochlear implants (CIs) or hearing aids (HAs) express English inflectional morphemes during conversation, i.e., with voice, with sign, or with both. A secondary objective was to investigate the relationship between morpheme use in pediatric CI users and their speech perception skills, length of experience with the device, and accuracy of phoneme production.
DESIGN: Group 1 consisted of 25 children who used CIs, and Group 2 consisted of 13 children who used HAs. All children were prelingually deafened and all used simultaneous communication. A 12 minute spontaneous conversation was elicited, transcribed and coded. Between group comparisons were performed to evaluate differences in modality and number of morphemes used. Additionally, use of morpheme endings was related to length of CI experience, accuracy of phoneme production, and closed-set speech recognition performance.
RESULTS: Children who had CI experience produced significantly more English inflected morphemes than children in the HA group. CI participants also expressed the inflected endings by using voice-only mode 91% of the time, whereas HA participants used voice-only mode 1% of the time. In the CI group, a strong relationship was found between number of morpheme endings used and speech recognition scores, length of CI experience and accuracy of phoneme production. The results of this study indicate that input from the CI facilitates children's ability to perceive and comprehend bound morphemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9728726      PMCID: PMC3210819          DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199808000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  21 in total

1.  Performance over time with a nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray; R S Tyler; G G Woodworth; B J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  H Fryauf-Bertschy; R S Tyler; D M Kelsay; B J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-08

3.  Analysis of the spontaneous speech samples of children with cochlear implants or tactile aids.

Authors:  M J Osberger; A M Robbins; S W Berry; S L Todd; L J Hesketh; A Sedey
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1991

4.  Consonant production in children receiving a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  E A Tobey; S Pancamo; S J Staller; J A Brimacombe; A L Beiter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Longitudinal evaluation of communication skills of children with single- or multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; M J Osberger; A M Robbins; W A Myres; K Kessler; M L Pope
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1992-05

6.  Effects of a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children.

Authors:  E A Tobey; S Hasenstab
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Language development in children receiving Nucleus multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  M S Hasenstab; E A Tobey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.

Authors:  M J Osberger; M Maso; L K Sam
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

9.  The grammaticality of manual representations of English in classroom settings.

Authors:  T N Kluwin
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1981-06

10.  Pediatric performance with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system.

Authors:  S J Staller; A L Beiter; J A Brimacombe; D J Mecklenburg; P Arndt
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1991
View more
  12 in total

1.  A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.

Authors:  J B Tomblin; L Spencer; S Flock; R Tyler; B Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Acquisition of tense marking in English-speaking children with cochlear implants: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Linda J Spencer; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2013-01-03

3.  Speech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with 7 years of device experience.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; Linda J Spencer; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Patrick F Reidy; Kayla Kristensen; Matthew B Winn; Ruth Y Litovsky; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Development of Grammatical Accuracy in English-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Linda J Spencer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  An Evolution of Communication Modalities: Very Young Cochlear Implant Users who Transitioned from Sign to Speech During the First Years of Use.

Authors:  Linda J Spencer; Sandie Bass-Ringdahl
Journal:  Int Congr Ser       Date:  2004-11

7.  Morphological Accuracy in the Speech of Bimodal Bilingual Children with CIs.

Authors:  Corina Goodwin; Diane Lillo-Martin
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  Long-term trajectories of the development of speech sound production in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Shu-Chen Peng; Linda J Spencer; Nelson Lu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Longitudinal speech perception and language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users: the effect of age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob Oleson; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst; J Bruce Tomblin; Haihong Ji; Karen I Kirk; Bob McMurray; Marlan Hanson; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Child implant users' imitation of happy- and sad-sounding speech.

Authors:  David J Wang; Sandra E Trehub; Anna Volkova; Pascal van Lieshout
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.