Literature DB >> 11132784

Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification.

S A Frisch1, D B Pisoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computational simulations were carried out to evaluate the appropriateness of several psycholinguistic theories of spoken word recognition for children who use cochlear implants. These models also investigate the interrelations of commonly used measures of closed-set and open-set tests of speech perception.
DESIGN: A software simulation of phoneme recognition performance was developed that uses feature identification scores as input. Two simulations of lexical access were developed. In one, early phoneme decisions are used in a lexical search to find the best matching candidate. In the second, phoneme decisions are made only when lexical access occurs. Simulated phoneme and word identification performance was then applied to behavioral data from the Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten test and Lexical Neighborhood Test of open-set word recognition. Simulations of performance were evaluated for children with prelingual sensorineural hearing loss who use cochlear implants with the MPEAK or SPEAK coding strategies.
RESULTS: Open-set word recognition performance can be successfully predicted using feature identification scores. In addition, we observed no qualitative differences in performance between children using MPEAK and SPEAK, suggesting that both groups of children process spoken words similarly despite differences in input. Word recognition ability was best predicted in the model in which phoneme decisions were delayed until lexical access.
CONCLUSIONS: Closed-set feature identification and open-set word recognition focus on different, but related, levels of language processing. Additional insight for clinical intervention may be achieved by collecting both types of data. The most successful model of performance is consistent with current psycholinguistic theories of spoken word recognition. Thus it appears that the cognitive process of spoken word recognition is fundamentally the same for pediatric cochlear implant users and children and adults with normal hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11132784      PMCID: PMC3440002          DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200012000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  18 in total

Review 1.  How do cochlear prostheses work?

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; C A Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Some computational analyses of the PBK test: effects of frequency and lexical density on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  T A Meyer; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Mathematical modeling of vowel perception by users of analog multichannel cochlear implants: temporal and channel-amplitude cues.

Authors:  M A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of children's familiarity with tokens on the PBK, LNT, and MLNT.

Authors:  K I Kirk; S T Sehgal; M Hay-McCutcheon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

6.  Predictors of cochlear implant performance.

Authors:  J E van Dijk; A F van Olphen; M C Langereis; L H Mens; J P Brokx; G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

7.  Multiple-choice intelligibility tests.

Authors:  J W BLACK
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1957-06

8.  Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: issues of efficacy and assessment.

Authors:  A Boothroyd
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1997

9.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Speech perception performance in experienced cochlear-implant patients receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant.

Authors:  A J Parkinson; W S Parkinson; R S Tyler; M W Lowder; B J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  Ted A Meyer; Stefan A Frisch; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Mandarin Chinese speech recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Meimei Zhu; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Ye Jiang; Jianghong Xu; Chenmei Xu; Duoduo Tao; Bing Chen
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.675

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.