Literature DB >> 10708075

Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

D B Pisoni1.   

Abstract

Over the past few years, there has been increased interest in studying some of the cognitive factors that affect speech perception performance of cochlear implant patients. In this paper, I provide a brief theoretical overview of the fundamental assumptions of the information-processing approach to cognition and discuss the role of perception, learning, and memory in speech perception and spoken language processing. The information-processing framework provides researchers and clinicians with a new way to understand the time-course of perceptual and cognitive development and the relations between perception and production of spoken language. Directions for future research using this approach are discussed including the study of individual differences, predicting success with a cochlear implant from a set of cognitive measures of performance and developing new intervention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708075      PMCID: PMC3429935          DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200002000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  29 in total

1.  Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  H Fryauf-Bertschy; R S Tyler; D M Kelsay; B J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-08

2.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on children's speech perception abilities with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  M J Osberger; S L Todd; S W Berry; A M Robbins; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills.

Authors:  T A Zwolan; S Zimmerman-Phillips; C J Ashbaugh; S J Hieber; P R Kileny; S A Telian
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; M A Svirsky; A M Robbins
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Chronometric analysis of classification.

Authors:  M I Posner; R F Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  The phonological loop as a language learning device.

Authors:  A Baddeley; S Gathercole; C Papagno
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Children with implants can speak, but can they communicate?

Authors:  A M Robbins; M Svirsky; K I Kirk
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  A phonological system at 2 years after cochlear implantation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; N L Cohen; R H Gomolin; W H Shapiro; S R Ozdamar; R A Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-11
View more
  55 in total

1.  Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.

Authors:  L Lachs; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The ear is connected to the brain: some new directions in the study of children with cochlear implants at Indiana University.

Authors:  Derek M Houston; Jessica Beer; Tonya R Bergeson; Steven B Chin; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Imitation of nonwords by hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants: segmental analyses.

Authors:  Caitlin M Dillon; Miranda Cleary; David B Pisoni; Allyson K Carter
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Implicit sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; David B Pisoni; Esperanza M Anaya; Jennifer Karpicke; Shirley C Henning
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-01

5.  Measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after more than 10 years of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Adrienne S Roman; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The Importance of Sound for Cognitive Sequencing Abilities: The Auditory Scaffolding Hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-10

7.  Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Cleary; D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Working memory in children with cochlear implants: problems are in storage, not processing.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Using early language outcomes to predict later language ability in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Karen Iler Kirk; Shirley C Henning; Sujuan Gao; Rong Qi
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.