T A Meyer1, D B Pisoni. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, DeVault Otologic Research Laboratory, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten (PBK) Test (Haskins, Reference Note 2) has been used for almost 50 yr to assess spoken word recognition performance in children with hearing impairments. The test originally consisted of four lists of 50 words, but only three of the lists (lists 1, 3, and 4) were considered "equivalent" enough to be used clinically with children. Our goal was to determine if the lexical properties of the different PBK lists could explain any differences between the three "equivalent" lists and the fourth PBK list (List 2) that has not been used in clinical testing. DESIGN: Word frequency and lexical neighborhood frequency and density measures were obtained from a computerized database for all of the words on the four lists from the PBK Test as well as the words from a single PB-50 (Egan, 1948) word list. RESULTS: The words in the "easy" PBK list (List 2) were of higher frequency than the words in the three "equivalent" lists. Moreover, the lexical neighborhoods of the words on the "easy" list contained fewer phonetically similar words than the neighborhoods of the words on the other three "equivalent" lists. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for researchers to consider word frequency and lexical neighborhood frequency and density when constructing word lists for testing speech perception. The results of this computational analysis of the PBK Test provide additional support for the proposal that spoken words are recognized "relationally" in the context of other phonetically similar words in the lexicon. Implications of using open-set word recognition tests with children with hearing impairments are discussed with regard to the specific vocabulary and information processing demands of the PBK Test.
OBJECTIVE: The Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten (PBK) Test (Haskins, Reference Note 2) has been used for almost 50 yr to assess spoken word recognition performance in children with hearing impairments. The test originally consisted of four lists of 50 words, but only three of the lists (lists 1, 3, and 4) were considered "equivalent" enough to be used clinically with children. Our goal was to determine if the lexical properties of the different PBK lists could explain any differences between the three "equivalent" lists and the fourth PBK list (List 2) that has not been used in clinical testing. DESIGN:Word frequency and lexical neighborhood frequency and density measures were obtained from a computerized database for all of the words on the four lists from the PBK Test as well as the words from a single PB-50 (Egan, 1948) word list. RESULTS: The words in the "easy" PBK list (List 2) were of higher frequency than the words in the three "equivalent" lists. Moreover, the lexical neighborhoods of the words on the "easy" list contained fewer phonetically similar words than the neighborhoods of the words on the other three "equivalent" lists. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for researchers to consider word frequency and lexical neighborhood frequency and density when constructing word lists for testing speech perception. The results of this computational analysis of the PBK Test provide additional support for the proposal that spoken words are recognized "relationally" in the context of other phonetically similar words in the lexicon. Implications of using open-set word recognition tests with children with hearing impairments are discussed with regard to the specific vocabulary and information processing demands of the PBK Test.
Authors: Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick; Brian French; Chad Gotch; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nancy Young Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: Sangsook Choi; Andrew Lotto; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Patricia Stelmachowicz Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.297