Literature DB >> 9062416

Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up.

A M Stiggelbout1, J C de Haes, R Vree, C J van de Velde, C M Bruijninckx, K van Groningen, J Kievit.   

Abstract

The aims of our study were to assess the effect of follow-up on the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients and to assess the attitudes of patients towards follow-up as a function of patient characteristics. Patients who had been treated with curative intent were selected from four types of hospitals. Eighty-two patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire, whereas 130 patients received the questionnaire by mail. To assess the effect of follow-up on the quality of life, the interviewed patients were randomly allocated to three groups and interviewed at different times in relation to the follow-up visit. Analysis did not show an effect of the follow-up visit on quality of life. Patients reported a positive attitude towards follow-up: it reassured them, they judged the communication with the physician to be positive, and they experienced only slight nervous anticipation and few other disadvantages. Patients reported a strong preference for follow-up, and a large majority would prefer follow-up even if it would not lead to earlier detection of a recurrence. Apart from living situation, no patient characteristics were clearly associated with the attitude towards follow-up. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9062416      PMCID: PMC2063387          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  18 in total

1.  Patients versus surrogates: whose opinion counts on ethics review panels?

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; E C Thiel; R M Clark
Journal:  Clin Res       Date:  1989-09

2.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The "utility" of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert; J Kievit; J W Leer; J D Habbema; J C De Haes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Evaluation of hospital and general practice follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J P Wyatt; R J Aitken
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  The follow-up of patients following surgery for colorectal cancer--a personal view.

Authors:  W H Isbister
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  Whose utilities for decision analysis?

Authors:  N F Boyd; H J Sutherland; K Z Heasman; D L Tritchler; B J Cummings
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A simplified plan for follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer supported by prospective studies of laboratory and radiologic test results.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; F J Gianola; A Dwyer; N R Neuman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Evaluation of routine follow-up after surgery for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  T Brøyn; J Frøyen
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1982

9.  Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthma.

Authors:  D J Cook; G H Guyatt; E Juniper; L Griffith; W McIlroy; A Willan; R Jaeschke; R Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist.

Authors:  J C de Haes; F C van Knippenberg; J P Neijt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  31 in total

1.  Guidelines for follow up after resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; R J Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Julia R Berian; Amanda Cuddy; Amanda B Francescatti; Linda O'Dwyer; Y Nancy You; Robert J Volk; George J Chang
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Adena Scheer; Rebecca Ann C Auer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

4.  Intensive or not surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer after curative resection.

Authors:  Gerardo Rosati
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Surveillance of patients following surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven Gan; Katherine Wilson; Paul Hollington
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  A systematic review of patient surveillance after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a brief review.

Authors:  Roberta Cardoso; Natalie G Coburn; Rajini Seevaratnam; Alyson Mahar; Lucy Helyer; Calvin Law; Simron Singh
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Follow-up recommendations for colon cancer.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Jo-Anne P Attard
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

9.  Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing in colorectal cancer follow up: what do patients think?

Authors:  Nicola Steele; Rachel Haigh; Gillian Knowles; Melanie Mackean
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines.

Authors:  Amanpal Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.