Literature DB >> 7561982

The "utility" of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off.

A M Stiggelbout1, G M Kiebert, J Kievit, J W Leer, J D Habbema, J C De Haes.   

Abstract

We examined the feasibility and the proportional trade-off assumption of the Time Trade-Off method. Utilities were assessed of the actual health states of 54 testicular and 72 colorectal cancer patients, treated with the curative intent and 29 incurable colorectal cancer patients. Three periods of time were used to assess proportionality: the subject's life expectancy and two shorter periods. Results showed the method to be feasible in curatively treated patients, though the use of life expectancy posed difficulties in some very old subjects. This same difficulty was encountered in patients with symptomatic incurable disease. A two step procedure is proposed as a solution. The proportional trade-off assumption was violated. Utilities for the longer period were smaller than those for the shorter periods. Life expectancy and trade-off did not correlate, though. Remarkable was that many patients were unwilling to trade at all. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7561982     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00011-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  25 in total

Review 1.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Differences in belief about likely outcomes account for differences in doctors' treatment preferences: but what accounts for the differences in belief?

Authors:  T Rakow
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

3.  Valuation of depression co-occurring with a somatic condition: feasibility of the time trade-off task.

Authors:  Katerina Papageorgiou; Karin M Vermeulen; Fenna R M Leijten; Erik Buskens; Adelita V Ranchor; Maya J Schroevers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods. Applications in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Paul McNamee; Sharon Glendinning; Jonathan Shenfine; Nick Steen; S Michael Griffin; John Bond
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-02

Review 5.  Using QALYs in cancer: a review of the methodological limitations.

Authors:  Martina Garau; Koonal K Shah; Anne R Mason; Qing Wang; Adrian Towse; Michael F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Use of forecasted assessment of quality of life to validate time-trade-off utilities and a prostate cancer screening decision-analytic model.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Ashish A Deshmukh; Murray D Krahn; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Time trade-off utility modified to accommodate degenerative and life-threatening conditions.

Authors:  M W Kattan; P A Fearn; B J Miles
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

8.  The way that you do it? An elaborate test of procedural invariance of TTO, using a choice-based design.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-15

9.  Effect of adaptive abilities on utilities, direct or mediated by mental health?

Authors:  Yvette Peeters; Adelita V Ranchor; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  The duration effect: a link between TTO and VAS values.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.