Literature DB >> 2257209

Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist.

J C de Haes1, F C van Knippenberg, J P Neijt.   

Abstract

Use of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) to measure psychological and physical distress as experienced by cancer patients, is discussed in this paper. The stability of the structure of the RSCL was assessed in principal component analyses in three studies: one concerning cancer patients during either chemotherapy or follow-up (n = 86), one done in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (n = 56), and the third dealing with cancer patients under treatment, disease-free 'patients', and 'normal' controls (n = 611). The psychological dimension proved to be stable across populations. A scale based on this factor was highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.88-0.94). The physical distress is reflected by several dimensions in a homogeneous population (pain, fatigue, gastrointestinal complaints) and undimensionally in a heterogeneous population. Reliability of the physical distress scales is good (0.71-0.88). The current components of the RSCL and the use of individual and disease specific symptoms are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2257209      PMCID: PMC1971567          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1990.434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  13 in total

1.  Development of a symptom distress scale.

Authors:  R McCorkle; K Young
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Comparative studies of psychological function in patients with advanced cancer--I. Self-reported depressive symptoms.

Authors:  M M Plumb; J Holland
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Effects of breast conservation on psychological morbidity associated with diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; M Baum; G P Maguire
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-22

Review 4.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: psychometric properties of instruments.

Authors:  F C van Knippenberg; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Measurement of quality of life in patients with cancer.

Authors:  P Selby; B Robertson
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1987

6.  Quality of life index for patients with cancer.

Authors:  G V Padilla; C Presant; M M Grant; G Metter; J Lipsett; F Heide
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.

Authors:  H Schipper; J Clinch; A McMurray; M Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomised trial comparing two combination chemotherapy regimens (Hexa-CAF vs CHAP-5) in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  J P Neijt; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; M E van der Burg; A T van Oosterom; R Vriesendorp; C D Kooyman; A C van Lindert; J V Hamerlynck; M van Lent; J C van Houwelingen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Assessing quality of life in cancer patients.

Authors:  P Maguire; P Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; J A Chapman; J Etazadi-Amoli; D Dalley; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  170 in total

1.  Quality of life as an instrument for need assessment and outcome assessment of health care in chronic patients.

Authors:  G A van den Bos; A H Triemstra
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  Aromatherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Cooke; E Ernst
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings?

Authors:  R J Stephens; P Hopwood; D J Girling; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Quality of life: philosophical question or clinical reality?

Authors:  M L Slevin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

5.  The impact of nausea and vomiting upon quality of life measures.

Authors:  J M Bliss; B Robertson; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

6.  Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life?

Authors:  A G E M de Boer; J J B van Lanschot; P F M Stalmeier; J W van Sandick; J B F Hulscher; J C J M de Haes; M A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Quality-of-life assessment in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Fayers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data in oncology trials: a comparison of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).

Authors:  Adam B Smith; Kim Cocks; David Parry; Matthew Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Noncancer life stresses in newly diagnosed cancer.

Authors:  Ulla-Sisko Lehto; Markku Ojanen; Anna Väkevä; Arpo Aromaa; Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Symptom assessment in children receiving cancer therapy: the parents' perspective.

Authors:  L Lee Dupuis; Cindy Milne-Wren; Marilyn Cassidy; Maru Barrera; Carol Portwine; Donna L Johnston; Mariana Pradier Silva; Cathryn Sibbald; Michael Leaker; Stacey Routh; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.