Literature DB >> 7180336

Evaluation of routine follow-up after surgery for breast carcinoma.

T Brøyn, J Frøyen.   

Abstract

Evaluation of routine follow-up after radical operation for breast carcinoma was focused on 81 women with recurrence. They were grouped according to whether the recurrence was detected at planned control examination (routine group), at examination between planned control dates (non-routine group) or in patients without routine control (non-follow-up group). Most of the recurrences were diagnosed at non-routine visits. The disease-free interval showed no significant difference between these three groups. The routine follow-up seemed to have no effect on survival. The interval from operation to detection of recurrence was less than three years in 75% of the cases. The average number of routine hospital visits preceding a diagnosis of recurrence was 118. Cancer of the second breast was found in four patients. The routine follow-up programme thus did not seem to favour early detection of recurrence or to prolong survival. The influence of regular follow-up on the quality of life is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7180336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Scand        ISSN: 0001-5482


  14 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of routine follow-up after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  O O Agboola; E Grunfeld; D Coyle; G A Perry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial.

Authors:  E Grunfeld; D Mant; P Yudkin; R Adewuyi-Dalton; D Cole; J Stewart; R Fitzpatrick; M Vessey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-14

3.  Usefulness of surveillance imaging in patients with head and neck cancer who are treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sweet Ping Ng; Courtney Pollard; Joel Berends; Zeina Ayoub; Mona Kamal; Adam S Garden; Houda Bahig; Scott B Cantor; Andrew J Schaefer; Temitayo Ajayi; G Brandon Gunn; Steven J Frank; Heath Skinner; Jack Phan; William H Morrison; Renata Ferrarotto; Jason M Johnson; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Stephen Y Lai; Amy C Hessel; Erich M Sturgis; Randal S Weber; Clifton D Fuller; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical surveillance for early stage breast cancer: an analysis of claims data.

Authors:  M S Simon; M Stano; R K Severson; M S Hoff; D W Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Value of bone scanning in the follow-up of breast cancer patients. A study of 1000 cases.

Authors:  H Schünemann; P J Langecker; W Ellgas; A Leonhardt; H Merkl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Review of general surgery 1982.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Cancer follow up: time for review.

Authors:  H Smedley; K Sikora
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-10

8.  Is follow up of patients after surgery for breast cancer worthwhile?

Authors:  M C Ormiston; A G Timoney; A R Qureshi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Breast cancer surveillance--a cost-effective strategy.

Authors:  D V Schapira
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  An evaluation of clinical follow-up in women with early stage breast cancer among physician members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  M S Simon; M Hoff; M Hussein; S Martino; A Walt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.