Literature DB >> 22902760

Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines.

Amanpal Singh1, Yong-Fang Kuo, James S Goodwin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients treated with surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) should undergo colonoscopy examinations 1, 4, and 9 years later, to check for cancer recurrence. We investigated the use patterns of surveillance colonoscopies among Medicare patients.
METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database to identify patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer from 1992 to 2005 and analyzed the timing of the first 3 colonoscopies after surgery. Early surveillance colonoscopy was defined as a colonoscopy, for no reason other than surveillance, within 3 months to 2 years after a colonoscopy examination with normal results.
RESULTS: Approximately 32.1% and 27.3% of patients with normal results from their first and second colonoscopies, respectively, underwent subsequent surveillance colonoscopies within 2 years (earlier than recommended). Of patients who were older than 80 years at their first colonoscopy, 23.6% underwent a repeat procedure within 2 years for no clear indication. In multivariable analysis, early surveillance colonoscopy was not associated with sex, race, or patients' level of education. There was significant regional variation in early surveillance colonoscopies among the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results regions. There was a significant trend toward reduced occurrence of second early surveillance colonoscopies.
CONCLUSIONS: Many Medicare enrollees who have undergone curative resection for colorectal cancer undergo surveillance colonoscopy more frequently than recommended by the guidelines. Reducing overuse could free limited resources for appropriate colonoscopy examinations of inadequately screened populations.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22902760      PMCID: PMC3776496          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  30 in total

1.  2000 update of American Society of Clinical Oncology colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  A B Benson; C E Desch; P J Flynn; C Krause; C L Loprinzi; B D Minsky; N J Petrelli; D G Pfister; T J Smith; M R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Practice parameters for the surveillance and follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Anthony; Clifford Simmang; Neil Hyman; Donald Buie; Donald Kim; Peter Cataldo; Charles Orsay; James Church; Daniel Otchy; Jeffery Cohen; W Brian Perry; Gary Dunn; Janice Rafferty; C Neal Ellis; Jan Rakinic; Phillip Fleshner; Thomas Stahl; Sharon Gregorcyk; Charles Ternent; John W Kilkenny; Mark Whiteford
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale.

Authors:  S J Winawer; R H Fletcher; L Miller; F Godlee; M H Stolar; C D Mulrow; S H Woolf; S N Glick; T G Ganiats; J H Bond; L Rosen; J G Zapka; S J Olsen; F M Giardiello; J E Sisk; R Van Antwerp; C Brown-Davis; D A Marciniak; R J Mayer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Benefits of colonoscopic surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Lautenbach; K A Forde; A I Neugut
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Differences between primary care physicians' and oncologists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Paul K J Han; Julia Rowland; Carrie N Klabunde; Tenbroeck Smith; Noreen Aziz; Craig Earle; John Z Ayanian; Patricia A Ganz; Michael Stefanek
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices.

Authors:  Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; Pauline Mysliwiec
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Patients' views on follow up of colorectal cancer: implications for risk communication and decision making.

Authors:  S Papagrigoriadis; B Heyman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Geographic variation in patient surveillance after colon cancer surgery.

Authors:  F E Johnson; L W McKirgan; M A Coplin; A M Vernava; W E Longo; T P Wade; K S Virgo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Improved survival after colorectal cancer in patients complying with a postoperative endoscopic surveillance program.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; H Stamm; G Kanzler; G Bernhard
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  R M Olson; N P Perencevich; A W Malcolm; J T Chaffey; R E Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Deriving comorbidities from medical records using natural language processing.

Authors:  Hojjat Salmasian; Daniel E Freedberg; Carol Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Quality measures for colonoscopy: where should we be in 2015?

Authors:  John I Allen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-03

4.  Colonoscopy Surveillance after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study.

Authors:  Chung Hyun Tae; Chang Mo Moon; Seong-Eun Kim; Sung-Ae Jung; Chang Soo Eun; Jae Jun Park; Geom Seog Seo; Jae Myung Cha; Sung Chul Park; Jaeyoung Chun; Hyun Jung Lee; Yunho Jung; Jin Oh Kim; Young-Eun Joo; Dong Il Park
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 6.  CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: emphasis on pre- and post-surgical evaluation.

Authors:  Nurhee Hong; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 8.  Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Sally W Vernon; L Kay Bartholomew; Caitlin C Murphy; Shirley M Bluethmann
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 9.  What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Authors:  Kelli S Hancock; Ranjan Mascarenhas; David Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

10.  Improving adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines: results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariko Carey; Robert Sanson-Fisher; Finlay Macrae; Emilie Cameron; David Hill; Catherine D'Este; Christopher Doran
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.